Comparative Assessment of the Quality of Aerosol Filters for the Analysis of Ambient Air Pollution

Introduction. Atmospheric aerosols contain many carcinogenic and toxic substances, a significant part of which is represented by heavy metals. Traditionally, metal analysis is preceded by air sampling on AFA-HA-20 filters; yet, the lack of regulations on permitted background levels of trace elements in the filter material may limit reliability of measurements. Selection of filters with similar technological parameters can be a way to improve analytical accuracy.

Objective: To determine contamination of different types of filters and to establish its effect on the results of spectral analysis of airborne metal concentrations in a large industrial city.

Materials and methods: We analyzed unexposed AFA-HA-20 filters and Merck Millipore MF filters (n = 30 each) for the content of 13 heavy metals identified as priority pollutants within the Federal Clean Air Project. To assess the effect of filter contamination on the analytical error, air sampling was performed by exposing Merck Millipore MF filters at mobile monitoring stations in the city of Lipetsk. The filters were then analyzed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry with prior microwave mineralization.

Results: Our findings confirm the repeatedly obtained data on metal contents in null AFA-HA-20 filters and indicate significantly lower levels of contamination of unexposed Millipore MF filters made of mixed cellulose ethers.

Conclusions: The risk of obtaining false positive and false negative results depends on the level and variability of the content of a particular trace metal in the filter. The AFA-HA-20 type of filters traditionally used for ambient air sampling may itself confound measurement result.

1. Kazantseva LK, Tagaeva TO. The global environmental problems: atmospheric air. Sovremennye Issledovaniya Sotsial’nykh Problem. 2010;(4-2):376–383. (In Russ.)

2. Amit S, D MS, Tushar K, Knox J, Satish B, Munshi MM. Influence of atmospheric aerosols on health and environment-climate change. Int J Life Sci. 2013;Sp.I-1:115–120.

3. Particle size-selective criteria for coarse aerosol fractions. In: Vincent J. Aerosol Sampling: Science, Standards, Instrumentation and Applications. 2007:237–253.

4. Bloss W. Measurement of air pollutants. In: Encyclopedia of Environmental Health. 2nd ed. Elsevier Masson, 2019:247–256. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.11354-5

5. Skugoreva SG, Ashihmina TYa, Fokina AI, Lyalina EI. Chemical grounds of toxic effect of heavy metals (review). Teoreticheskaya i Prikladnaya Ekologiya. 2016;(1):4–13. (In Russ.)

6. Gosangi A. Effect of copper on lipid peroxidation and enzymatic antioxidants in sorghum bicolor. Int J Adv Res. 2017;5(9):424–430. doi: 10.21474/IJAR01/5346

7. Pupyshev AA. [Atomic absorption spectral analysis.] Moscow: Technosphere Publ., 2009. (In Russ.)

8. Galeva EI, Kholin KV, Nefediev E. Possibilities of atomic emission spectrometry with inductively coupled plasma. Vestnik Kazanskogo Tekhnologicheskogo Universiteta. 2013;16(9):63–64. (In Russ.)

9. Pupyshev AA, Surikov VT. [Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry. Formation of Ions.] Saarbrücken: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing GmbH & Co. KG; 2012. (In Russ.)

10. Lapova TV, Petrova EV, Otmakhov VI, Otmakhova ZI. Atomic emission spectroscopy control of the atmosphere pollution by heavy metals. Vestnik TGASU. 2008;(2(19)):138–147. (In Russ.)

11. Lindsley WG. Filter pore size and aerosol sample collection. In: NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods. 5th ed. 2016:FP2–FP14. Accessed August 27, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2014-151/pdfs/chapters/chapter-fp.pdf

12. Hebisch R, Fricke H-H, Hahn J-U, Lahaniatis M, Maschmeier C-P, Mattenklott M. Sampling and determining aerosols and their chemical components. In: Parlar H, ed. The MAK Collection for Occupational Health and Safety. Part III: Air monitoring methods. 2005;9:1–40.

13. Unproductive Time Traps in ICP-MS Analysis and How to Avoid Them. Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2021. Accessed April 29, 2021. https://www.technologynetworks.com/analysis/ebook/unproductive-time-trapsin-icp-ms-analysis-and-how-to-avoid-them-346921

14. Bashilov AV. [Spectral methods of elemental analysis following microwave mineralization of samples. Status and trends.] Laboratoriya i Proizvodstvo. 2018;(2):100–112. (In Russ.)

15. Bashilov AV. Micro-wave preparation of samples for elemental analysis – yesterday, today, tomorrow. Analitika. 2011;(1(1)):6–15. (In Russ.)

16. Korkina D, Clark-Karskaya Yu, Ivanova A, Zakharova A, Kuzin A, Grinshtein I. A clean work station – integrated solution of the samples contamination problem during the trace elemental analysis. Analitika. 2016;(2(27)):58–68. (In Russ.)

17. Mahalingam T.R. Metal free clean room for ultra trace analysis. In: Clean Laboratories and Clean Rooms for Analysis of Radionuclides and Trace Elements. Vienna: IAEA Publ.; 2003:29–41. Accessed August 27, 2021. https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/34/033/34033966.pdf?r=1

18. Stolboushkina TP, Stakheev AA. Purity of glassware – a key to reliable and accurate measurements. Al’manakh Sovremennoy Metrologii. 2018;(14):201–205. (In Russ.)

19. Welna M, Szymczycha-Madeja A, Pohl P. Quality of the trace element analysis: Sample preparation steps. In: Akyar I, ed. Wide Spectra of Quality Control. Rijeka: InTech Janeza Trdine 9; 2011. doi: 10.5772/21290

20. Darbouret D, Kano I. Ultrapure water blank for boron trace analysis. J Anal At Spectrom. 2000;15(10):1395–1399. doi: 10.1039/b001495h