International Requirements for Translation and Cultural Adaptation of the Universal COPSOQ III Questionnaire for Workplace Psychosocial Risk Assessment and Health Promotion in Healthcare Professionals
https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2023-31-1-29-33
Abstract
Introduction: The medical profession is characterized by high requirements for implementation of activities assessed by the quality of services provided and patient satisfaction with medical care. In this regard, healthcare professionals suffer from high psychological and emotional stress. The proposed COPSOQ III questionnaire contributes to identification and prevention of psychosocial factors affecting health and well-being of medical workers.
Objective: To study international requirements for the order of translation and cultural adaptation of the long version of the COPSOQ III questionnaire on assessment of psychosocial working conditions and health promotion in medical workers in the Russian health care system.
Materials and methods: The questionnaire was compiled in English. It contains 160 questions and criteria for assessing psychosocial working conditions of medical workers. The original version was translated into Russian; after that, back translation and the repeated translation was done for validation purposes and cultural adaptation of the COPSOQ questionnaire in the national health system. According to the recommendations of the COPSOQ International Network for translation and cultural adaptation of the text, we followed stages of validation and coordination of the stage outcomes and the final report.
Results: To assess the linguistic load of the Russian-language version of the long COPSOQ questionnaire, its testing was carried out with participation of ten general practitioners with the positive feedback received.
About the Authors
M A. Kuznetsova
N.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maria A. Kuznetsova, postgraduate student, Junior Researcher, Department of Lifestyle Studies and Health Protection
Bldg 1, 12 Vorontsovo Pole Street, Moscow, 105064
T. P. Vasilyeva
N.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatyana P. Vasilyeva, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Prof., Chief Researcher, Department of Lifestyle Studies and Health Protection
Bldg 1, 12 Vorontsovo Pole Street, Moscow, 105064
S V. Tyranovets
N.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey V. Tyranovets, Researcher, Department of Lifestyle Studies and Health Protection
Bldg 1, 12 Vorontsovo Pole Street, Moscow, 105064
References
1. Greenglass E, Burke RJ, Fiksenbaum L. Workload and burnout in nurses. J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2001;11(3):211-215. doi: 10.1002/CASP.614
2. Fariselli L, Ghini M, Freedman J. Age and emotional intelligence. In: Six Seconds. The Emotional Intelligence Network. 2008:1-10. Accessed December 7, 2022. https://prodimages.6seconds.org/media/WP_EQ_and_Age.pdf
3. Leka S, Jain A, World Health Organization. Health Impact of Psychosocial Hazards at Work: An Overview. World Health Organization; 2010. Accessed August 12, 2022. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44428
4. Schabracq MJ, Winnubst JAM, Cooper CL, eds. The Handbook of Work and Health Psychology. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons; 2003. Accessed December 7, 2022. https://www.al-edu.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Handbook-of-Work-and-Health-Psychology-2Ed-2003.pdf
5. Giumetti GW, Bulger CA, Schonfeld IS, Chang C-H. Occupational health psychology. In: Occup Health Sci. 2017;1(1-2):105-109. doi: 10.1007/s41542-017-0002-4
6. Kristensen TS, Hannerz H, Hugh A, Borg V. The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire – a tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005;31(6):438-449. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.948
7. Burr H, Berthelsen H, Moncada S, et al. The third version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. Saf Health Work. 2019;10(4):482-503. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2019.10.002
8. Baka L, Prusik M, Pejtersen JH, Grala K. Full evaluation of the psychometric properties of COPSOQ II. One-year longitudinal study on Polish human service staff. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(1):e0262266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262266
9. Baç N, Ekmekçi I. Psychosocial risk assessment using COPSOQ II questionnaire – A case study with maintenance workers in a metal plant in Istanbul Turkey. Heliyon. 2021;7(4):e06777. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06777
10. Zigkiri E, Charalampopoulou M, Kokka A, Bacopoulou F, Darviri C, Chrousos GP. Validation of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire – Long Version II (COPSOQ II) in Greek employees. EMBnet J. 2021;26:e977. doi: 10.14806/ej.26.1.977
11. Lincke HJ, Vomstein M, Lindner A, et al. COPSOQ III in Germany: validation of a standard instrument to measure psychosocial factors at work. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2021;16(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12995-021-00331-1
12. McKee H, Gohar B, Appleby R, Nowrouzi-Kia B, Hagen BNM, Jones-Bitton A. High psychosocial work demands, decreased well-being, and perceived well-being needs within veterinary academia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Vet Sci. 2021;8:746716. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.746716
13. Nulling M, Vomstein M, Haug A, Nolle I, Lindner A, Lincke HJ. COPSOQ 3: Internationale Weiterentwicklung und deutsche Standardversion [COPSOQ 3: international development and German standard version]. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2018;68(08):e41. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1667980
14. Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94104. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x
15. Appel P, Schuler M, Vogel H, Oezelsel A, Faller H. Short Questionnaire for Workplace Analysis (KFZA): factorial validation in physicians and nurses working in hospital settings. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2017;12:11. doi: 10.1186/s12995-017-0157-6
16. Toledo M, Charles-Leija H, Castro CG, Guerrero I, Ballesteros-Valdés R. The IWH-BEAT Questionnaire validation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(6):3559. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063559
17. Haruta J, Maeno T, Takayashiki A, Goto R, Ozone S, Maeno T. Validation of the professional self-identity questionnaire for medical students during clinical practice in Japan. Int J Med Educ. 2021;12:160-165. doi: 10.5116/ijme.610d.104b
18. Jenny GJ, Bauer GF, Vinje HF, Vogt K, Torp S. The application of salutogenesis to work. In: Jenny GJ, Bauer GF, Vinje HF, et al., eds. The Handbook of Salutogenesis. Springer, Cham; 2016:197210. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-04600-6_20
19. Bauer GF, Vogt К, Inauen A, Jenny G. Work-SoC–Entwicklung und Validierung einer Skala zur Erfassung des arbeitsbezogenen Kohärenzgefühls. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie. 2015;23(1):20-30. doi: 10.1026/0943-8149/a000132
20. Peter KA, Golz C, Bürgin RA, Nübling M, Voirol C, Zürcher SJ, Hahn S. Assessing the psychosocial work environment in the health care setting: translation and psychometric testing of the French and Italian Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaires (COPSOQ) in a large sample of health professionals in Switzerland. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 6;22(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07924-4
21. Nowrouzi-Kia B, Dong J, Gohar B, Hoad M. Examining the Mental Health, Wellbeing, Work Participation and Engagement of Medical Laboratory Professionals in Ontario, Canada: An Exploratory Study. Front Public Health. 2022; 15;10:876883. doi: 10.3389/ fpubh.2022.876883
22. Schulze S, Merz S, Thier A, Tallarek M, König F, Uhlenbrock G, Nübling M, Lincke HJ, Rapp MA, Spallek J, Holmberg C. Psychosocial burden in nurses working in nursing homes during the Covid-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study with quantitative and qualitative data. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 26;22(1):949. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08333-3
23. Cotrim TP, Bem-Haja P, Pereira A, Fernandes C, Azevedo R, Antunes S, Pinto JS, Kanazawa F, Souto I, Brito E, Silva CF. The Portuguese Third Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire: Preliminary Validation Studies of the Middle Version among Municipal and Healthcare Workers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 21;19(3):1167. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031167.
24. Eriksson A, Dellve L, Williamsson A, Skagert K. How Conditions and Resources Connected to Digital Management Systems and Remote Work Are Associated with Sustainable Work. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 26;19(23):15731. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315731
Review
For citations:
Kuznetsova M.A., Vasilyeva T.P., Tyranovets S.V. International Requirements for Translation and Cultural Adaptation of the Universal COPSOQ III Questionnaire for Workplace Psychosocial Risk Assessment and Health Promotion in Healthcare Professionals. Public Health and Life Environment – PH&LE. 2023;31(1):29-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2023-31-1-29-33
Views:
789
.png)
Email this article 