Preview

Public Health and Life Environment – PH&LE

Advanced search

Development of Telemedicine in Russia: A Consumer View

https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2021-29-12-7-16

Abstract

Introduction: One of the most significant trends in the global and Russian healthcare system is its digitalization. The COVID-19 pandemic has only given more importance and accelerated this process. The worldwide demand for telemedicine services has grown considerably. Yet, among Russian citizens e-health is not very popular. Besides, the use of telehealth gives rise to controversial issues as to the boundaries of its application.

Objective: To analyze the attitude of various socio-demographic groups of Russian people to telemedicine and perspectives on its use.

Methods: The article is based on the results of a sociological study aimed to establish the attitude of citizens to telemedicine. In order to obtain empirical information, an all-Russian sociological survey of the population representing various socio-demographic groups was carried out in April 2021. The survey method was a formalized personal interview at the place of residence of the respondents.

Results: The study showed that few respondents had ever made use of telemedicine opportunities so far. At the same time, the low level of e-health use was accompanied by a very restrained attitude of the respondents to practicing it in the future.

Conclusion: According to the data obtained, having a higher level of education allows citizens to integrate much more easily into innovative projects, including those in the digital space. Personal experience of using digital (e-health) technologies determines a more loyal attitude and greater interest of consumers to its potential use. The attractiveness of telemedicine opportunities is mostly attributed to complicated formal administrative procedures of obtaining medical certificates, referrals, and sick leaves offline. However, Russians are still wary of the possibilities of having the first consultation or monitoring their well-being and condition during the online treatment process. The majority of the respondents did not accept the diagnosis and the choice of treatment by means of telecommunications.

About the Authors

A. N. Pokida
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Andrei N. Pokida, Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Director of the Research Center for Social and Political Monitoring, Institute of Social Sciences

82 Vernadsky Avenue, Moscow, 119571

 



N. V. Zybunovskaya
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Natalia V. Zybunovskaya, Research Fellow, Research Center for Social and Political Monitoring, Institute of Social Sciences

82 Vernadsky Avenue, Moscow, 119571

 



References

1. Colbert GB, Venegas-Vera AV, Lerma EV. Utility of telemedicine in the COVID-19 era. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2020;21(4): 583-587. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm.2020.04.188

2. Bokolo AJ. Exploring the adoption of telemedicine and virtual software for care of outpatients during and after COVID-19 pandemic. Ir J Med Sci. 2021;190(1):1-10. doi:10.1007/s11845-020-02299-z

3. Wang H, Yuan X, Wang J, Sun C, Wang G. Telemedicine maybe an effective solution for management of chronic disease during the COVID-19 epidemic. Primary Health Care Research & Development. 2021;22(e48): 1–7. doi: 10.1017/S1463423621000517

4. Mirsky JB, Horn DM. Chronic disease management in the COVID-19 era. Am J Manag Care. 2020 Aug;26(8):329-330. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.43838

5. Cassar MR, Borg D, Camilleri L, et. al. A novel use of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020;103:182–187. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.11.170

6. Baranov AA, Vishneva EA, Namazova-Baranova LS. Telemedicine — prospects and difficulties before a new development stage. Pediatric Pharmacology. 2013;10(3):6-11. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.15690/pf.v10i3.691

7. Kaplan B. Revisiting health information technology ethical, legal, and social issues and evaluation: telehealth/telemedicine and COVID-19. Int J Med Inform. 2020 Nov;143:104239. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104239

8. Zhuravlev MS, Tyagai ED. [Legal problems of telemedicine. cyberphysical systems implanted into the human body.] HSE report. Moscow: Izdatel'skiy dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomik, 2021. (In Russ.) Accessed on November 11, 2021. https://www.hse.ru/news/expertise/482930111.html

9. Fadeeva EV. Will E-Health Make Medicine More Accessibile? Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2020;11:68-75. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31857/S013216250010580-1

10. Gorodnova NV, Klevtsov VV, Ovchinnikov EN. Prospects of telemedicine development in the context of digitalization of the Russian economy. Voprosy Innovatsionnoy Ekonomiki. 2019;9(3):1049-1066. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18334/vinec.9.3.41173

11. Zingerman BV, Shklovsky-Kordi NE, Vorobiev AI. About telemedicine «Patient to Doctor». Vrach i Informatsionnye Tekhnologii. 2017;1:61-79. (In Russ.) Accessed on November 11, 2021. https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_28394146_69670541.pdf.

12. Dmitrieva NE, Zhulin AB, Artamonov RE, Titov EA. [Assessment of the digital readiness of the population of Russia: reports. to XXII Apr. int. scientific. conf. on the problems of economic and social development, Moscow, 13–30 April. 2021] HSE. Moscow: Izdatel'skiy dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. 2021. (In Russ.) Accessed on November 11, 2021. https://conf.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/464963752.pdf

13. Shaderkin IA. Economic aspects of telemedicine. Russian Journal of Telemedicine and E-Health. 2021;7(3):65-72. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.29188/2712-9217-2021-7-3-65-72

14. Telemedicine: opportunities and developments in Member States: report on the second global survey on eHealth. World Health Organization. 2012. (In Russ.) Accessed on November 11, 2021. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/87687

15. Zheleznyakova IA, Khelisupali TA, Omelyanovskiy VV, Tishkina SN. Application of foreign experience of telemedicine services in the Russian Federation. Medical Technologies. Assessment and Choice. 2020;(2):26-34. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.17116/medtech20204002126

16. Ivanov AA. Telemedical solutions for instrumental diagnostics at home in a patient in a pandemic. Journal of Telemedicine and E-Health. 2021;7(1):25-34. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.29188/2542-2413-2021-7-1-25-34

17. [SocioDigger. 2020. November. Volume 1. Issue 4: Health. Healthcare. Bioethics. Expanded data collection.] VTsIOM. (In Russ.) Accessed on November 11, 2021. https://sociodigger.ru/279/

18. Bogdan IV, Gurylina MV, Chistyakova DP. Prospects and risks of telemedicine: survey results. In: Sociology and Society: Traditions and Innovations in the Social Development of Regions [Electronic resource]: Collection of reports of the VI All-Russian Sociological Congress (Tyumen, October 14-16, 2020). In: Mansurov VA; Ivanova EYu., eds. Moscow: ROS; FNISTs RAN Publ., 2020; 2543-2549. (In Russ.) doi:10.19181/kongress.2020.307

19. Polunina NV, Tyazhelnikov AA, Pogonin AV, Kostenko EV. COVID-19 patients’ satisfaction with quality of medical care provided in the form of telemedicine consultations. Vestnik RGMU. 2020;6:142-148. (In Russ.) doi: 10.24075/vrgmu.2020.084

20. Drapkina OM, Shepel RN, Vakhovskaya TV, Zhamalov LM, Kutcher AV, Bulgakova ES. Evaluation of the effectiveness of telemedicine consultations conducted by experts of National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine. The Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2020;23(6):Issue 1:7–14. (In Russ.). doi: https://doi.org/10.17116/profmed2020230617


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Pokida A.N., Zybunovskaya N.V. Development of Telemedicine in Russia: A Consumer View. Public Health and Life Environment – PH&LE. 2021;1(12):7-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2021-29-12-7-16

Views: 1931


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2219-5238 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0788 (Online)