Preview

Public Health and Life Environment – PH&LE

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Epidemiological and Molecular Genetic Monitoring of Measles in Kazakhstan in 2023

https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2025-33-3-41-48

Abstract

Introduction: Measles virus remains one of the main causes of childhood morbidity and mortality, posing a serious threat to most countries. Since March 2023, measles incidence rates have been growing in Kazakhstan, with the disease registered in previously unvaccinated, incompletely or untimely vaccinated children and adults representing a wide unimmunized stratum of the population.
Objective: To conduct epidemiological and molecular genetic monitoring of measles viruses causing the increase in disease incidence in Kazakhstan in 2023.
Materials and methods: The analysis of measles incidence in the Republic of Kazakhstan in 2023 was based on state statistics. In order to genotype circulating measles strains, we took 69 clinical urine samples and performed Sanger sequencing of the C-terminal region of the N-gene.
Results: In 2023, 29,731 measles cases were registered in Kazakhstan, the incidence rate being 149.95 per 100 thousand population. Most of the cases were children aged 1 to 4 years – 43.3 %, followed by children aged 5–14 years – 19.9 % and children aged 0–12 months – 16.1 %, of which 65.9 % were not vaccinated against measles. The results of nucleotide sequencing of 69 samples from measles patients showed two genotypes – D8 and B3.
Discussion: Measles cases in 2023 were registered throughout Kazakhstan. Measles virus genotype D8 was represented by the predominant line 8248, identified in Tajikistan in 2021 and circulating in Europe. Genotype B3 was associated with strains first identified in India and Saudi Arabia. These data confirm that measles incidence in Kazakhstan was attributed to viruses imported from other countries.
Conclusion: Findings of epidemiological analysis and molecular genetic testing of measles viruses confirm continued circulation of genotypes B3 and D8 and emphasize the importance of continuing monitoring and increasing vaccination rates to control the disease spread.

About the Authors

A. S. Mutaliyeva
Scientific and Practical Center for Sanitary and Epidemiological Expertise and Monitoring, Branch of the National Center for Public Health
Kazakhstan

Aknur S. Mutaliyeva, Head of the Reference Laboratory for the Control of Viral Infections of the Branch

84 Auezov Street, Almaty, 050000



A. B. Gabiden
Scientific and Practical Center for Sanitary and Epidemiological Expertise and Monitoring, Branch of the National Center for Public Health
Kazakhstan

Altynay B. Gabiden, Specialist of the Reference Laboratory for the Control of Viral Infections of the Branch

84 Auezov Street, Almaty, 050000



M. Zh. Tleubergenova
Scientific and Practical Center for Sanitary and Epidemiological Expertise and Monitoring, Branch of the National Center for Public Health
Russian Federation

Madina Zh. Tleubergenova, Specialist of the Reference Laboratory for the Control of Viral Infections of the Branch

84 Auezov Street, Almaty, 050000



A. M. Kuatbaeva
Scientific and Practical Center for Sanitary and Epidemiological Expertise and Monitoring, Branch of the National Center for Public Health
Kazakhstan

Ainagul M. Kuatbayeva, Director of the Branch

84 Auezov Street, Almaty, 050000



A. E. Tulemagambetov
Scientific and Practical Center for Sanitary and Epidemiological Expertise and Monitoring, Branch of the National Center for Public Health
Kazakhstan

Aidana Е. Tulemagambetova, Laboratory assistant of the Reference Laboratory for the Control of Viral Infections of the Branch

84 Auezov Street, Almaty, 050000



E. S. Utegenova
Scientific and Practical Center for Sanitary and Epidemiological Expertise and Monitoring, Branch of the National Center for Public Health
Kazakhstan

Elmira S. Utegenova, Deputy Director of the Branch

84 Auezov Street, Almaty, 050000



M. A. Smagul
Scientific and Practical Center for Sanitary and Epidemiological Expertise and Monitoring, Branch of the National Center for Public Health
Kazakhstan

Манар A. Smagul, Deputy Chairman

84 Auezov Street, Almaty, 050000



A. S. Yesmagambetova
Scientific and Practical Center for Sanitary and Epidemiological Expertise and Monitoring, Branch of the National Center for Public Health
Kazakhstan

Aizhan S. Yesmagambetova, Chairman

84 Auezov Street, Almaty, 050000



References

1. Riddell MA, Rota JS, Rota PA. Review of the temporal and geographical distribution of measles virus genotypes in the prevaccine and postvaccine eras. Virol J. 2005;2:87. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-2-87

2. Rota PA, Brown K, Mankertz A, et al. Global distribution of measles genotypes and measles molecular epidemiology. J Infect Dis. 2011;204(Suppl 1):S514-S523. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir118

3. Santibanez S, Tischer A, Heider A, Siedler A, Hengel H. Rapid replacement of endemic measles virus genotypes. J Gen Virol. 2002;83(Pt 11):2699-2708. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-83-11-2699

4. Wolfson LJ, Grais RF, Luquero FJ, Birmingham ME, Strebel PM. Estimates of measles case fatality ratios: A comprehensive review of community-based studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38(1):192-205. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn224

5. Moss WJ. Measles. Lancet. 2017;390(10111):2490-2502. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31463-0

6. Ma DZ, Pfaller CK, eds. Measles and Related Morbilliviruses: Methods and Protocols. Humana New York, NY; 2024. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3870-5

7. Naim HY. Measles virus: a pathogen, vaccine, and a vector. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11(1):21-26. doi: 10.4161/hv.34298

8. Abeev A, Zhylkibayev A, Kamalova D, et al. Epidemiological outbreaks of measles virus in Kazakhstan during 2015. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2018;71(5):354-359. doi: 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2017.565

9. Tleumbetova N, Nusupbayeva G, Amandosova D, Kulzhabaeva A, Durumbetov E, Magai A. Genetic variability of wild-type measles viruses, circulating in the Republic of Kazakhstan 2015 year]. Vestnik Kazakhstanskogo Natsional’nogo Meditsinskogo Universiteta. 2017;(4):27-30. (In Russ.)

10. Kumar S., et al. Epidemiology and control of measles: A global perspective. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2019; 219(Supplement_1): S11-S18. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiy600

11. Parker EP, et al. Global epidemiology of measles: trends and future directions. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2019;19(9):e291-e300. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30306-1

12. Rubalskaia TS, Erokhov DV, Zherdeva PE, Mamaeva TA, Tikhonova NT. Global genetic diversity of measles virus (Paramyxoviridae: Morbillivirus: Morbillivirus hominis): Historical aspects and current state. Voprosy Virusologii. 2023;68(5):361-371. (In Russ.) doi: 10.36233/0507-4088-187

13. Ackley SF, Hacker JK, Enanoria WTA, et al. Genotype-specific measles transmissibility: A branching process analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66(8):1270-1275. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix974

14. Rota PA, Bellini WJ. Update on the global distribution of genotypes of wild type measles viruses. J Infect Dis. 2003;187(Suppl 1):S270-S276. doi: 10.1086/368042

15. Klein N. P., et al. The changing epidemiology of measles in the 21st century. Vaccine. 2019; 37(37): 5485-5492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.06.017

16. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28(10):2731-2739. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121

17. Letunic I., Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: An online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(W1):W293-W296. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab301

18. Ali I. Impact of COVID-19 on vaccination programs: Adverse or positive? Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020;16(11):2594-2600. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1787065

19. Moss WJ, Griffin DE. Paramyxoviruses: measles. In: Viral infections of humans: Epidemiology and control. New York, NY: Springer US; 2023:1-29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9544-8_23-1

20. Santibanez S, Hübschen JM, Ben Mamou MC, et al. Molecular surveillance of measles and rubella in the WHO European Region: New challenges in the elimination phase. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017;23(8):516-523. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.06.030

21. Chatterjee P., Dutta, A. Molecular methods for the detection of measles virus: Current status and future prospects. Journal of Clinical Virology. 2022; 149: 104213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2022.104213

22. Lüthy IA, Kantor IN. Measles. Medicina (B Aires). 2020;80(2):162-168. (In Spanish.)

23. Ciceri G, Canuti M, Bianchi S, et al. Genetic variability of the measles virus hemagglutinin gene in B3 genotype strains circulating in Northern Italy. Infect Genet Evol. 2019;75:103943. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2019.103943

24. Khan S, Kulp D. Genetic diversity of measles virus strains: Insights from recent outbreaks. Virus Research. 2019;263:198205. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2019.198205

25. O’Connor P, Jankovic D, Muscat M, et al. Measles and rubella elimination in the WHO Region for Europe: Progress and challenges. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017;23(8):504-510. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.01.003


Review

For citations:


Mutaliyeva A.S., Gabiden A.B., Tleubergenova M.Zh., Kuatbaeva A.M., Tulemagambetov A.E., Utegenova E.S., Smagul M.A., Yesmagambetova A.S. Epidemiological and Molecular Genetic Monitoring of Measles in Kazakhstan in 2023. Public Health and Life Environment – PH&LE. 2025;33(3):41-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2025-33-3-41-48

Views: 156


ISSN 2219-5238 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0788 (Online)