General Manifestations of Tick-Borne Infections in the Amur Region in 2014–2023

Introduction: Tick-borne infections (TBI) require special attention of health professionals owing to their high epidemic significance. High rates of tick bite visits are registered in Russia while the incidence rates of tick-borne diseases range dramatically across different regions of the country.

Objective: To describe several features of epidemiological manifestations of tick-borne infections in the Amur Region.

Materials and methods: The analysis of TBI incidence rates registered in the population of the Amur Region by disease, age, sex, and administrative area was based on data of statistical observation forms No. 1, 2 “Information about infectious and parasitic diseases” and annual state reports on sanitary and epidemiological well-being of the population of the Amur Region for the years 2014 to 2023. Annual rates of tick bite visits and frequency of pathogen detection in the removed ticks were calculated. Statistical data analysis was carried out in Excel 2013.

Results: Epidemiological analysis revealed a trend towards a decrease in TBI incidence from 4.81 %000 in 2014 to 0.26 %000 in 2021; predominance of tick-borne rickettsiosis (56.77 %; 95 % CI: 48.98–64.57 %) in the structure of long-term incidence of the regional population; registration of most disease cases in steppe landscape zones (57.42 %; 95 % CI: 48.38–66.46 %) and among the adult population (85.81 %; 95 % CI: 80.32–91.30 %); a statistical correlation between tick bite visits and TBI prevalence (r = 0.64) and ixodid tick-borne borreliosis (r = 0.82), as well as the correlation between the incidence of ixodid tick-borne borreliosis and the frequency of detecting borrelia in ticks removed from patients (r = 0.677).

Conclusion: Further development of the TBI situation in the Amur Region will be defined by changes in forest cover area related to both anthropogenic transformations and natural emergencies.

1. Korenberg EI. Ways of improving epidemiological surveillance of natural focal infections. Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika. 2016;15(6(91)):18-29. (In Russ.)

2. Sirotkin MB, Korenberg EI. Influence of abiotic factors on different developmental stages of the taiga tick Ixodes persulcatus and the sheep tick Ixodes ricinus. Entomological Review. 2018;98(4):496-513. doi: 10.1134/S0013873818040115

3. Pen’evskaya NA, Rudakov NV, Shpynov SN, et al. Review of epidemiological situation on rickettsioses in the Russian Federation in 2022 as compared with 2013–2021, forecast for 2023. Problemy Osobo Opasnykh Infektsiy. 2023;(2):35-48. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21055/03701069-2023-2-35-48

4. Nikitin AYa, Andaev EI, Yatsmenko EV, et al. Epidemiological situation on tick-borne viral encephalitis in the Russian Federation in 2019 and forecast for 2020. Problemy Osobo Opasnykh Infektsiy. 2020;(1):33-42. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21055/0370-1069-2020-1-33-42

5. Zhou H, Ma Z, Hu T, et al. Tamdy virus in ixodid ticks infesting Bactrian camels, Xinjiang, China, 2018. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25(11):2136-2138. doi: 10.3201/eid2511.190512

6. Kolyasnikova NM, Ishmukhametov AA, Akimkin VG. The current state of the problem of tick-borne encephalitis in Russia and the world. Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika. 2023;22(1):104-123. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31631/2073-3046-2023-22-1-104-123

7. Rubis LV, Chevskaya VE, Ekimova OV, Safonova OS. Assessment of registered and hidden epidemic process of tick-borne encephalitis in the Republic of Karelia. Zhurnal Mikrobiologii, Epidemiologii i Immunobiologii. 2023;100(6):472-484. (In Russ.) doi: 10.36233/0372-9311-401

8. Andaev EI, Nikitin AYa, Yatsmenko EV, et al. Trends in epidemic process of tick-borne encephalitis in the Russian Federation, laboratory diagnosis, prophylaxis and forecast for 2021. Problemy Osobo Opasnykh Infektsiy. 2021;(1):6–16. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21055/0370-1069-2021-1-6-16

9. Kholodilov I, Belova O, Burenkova L, et al. Ixodid ticks and tick-borne encephalitis virus prevalence in the South Asian part of Russia (Republic of Tuva). Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2019;10(5):959-969. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2019.04.019

10. Kozlova IV, Demina TV, Tkachev SE, et al. Characteristics of the Baikal subtype of tick-borne encephalitis virus circulating in Eastern Siberia. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2018;3(4):53-60. doi: 10.29413/ABS.2018-3.4.9

11. Bogovic P, Strle F. Tick-borne encephalitis: A review of epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and management. World J Clin Cases. 2015;3(5):430-441. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i5.430

12. Nafeev AA, Savelyeva NV, Sibaeva EI. Immunological (serological) monitoring in the epidemiological surveillance system of natural - focal infections. Epidemiologiya i Infektsionnye Bolezni. 2016;21(5):286-289. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18821/1560-9529-2016-21-5-286-289

13. Hussain S, Hussain A, Aziz U, et al. The role of ticks in the emergence of Borrelia burgdorferi as a zoonotic pathogen and its vector control: A global systemic review. Microorganisms. 2021;9(12):2412. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9122412

14. Eisen L. Vector competence studies with hard ticks and Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato spirochetes: A review. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2020;11(3):101359. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2019.101359

15. Steinbrink A, Brugger K, Margos G, Kraiczy P, Klimpel S. The evolving story of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato transmission in Europe. Parasitol Res. 2022;121(3):781-803. doi: 10.1007/s00436-022-07445-3

16. Sprong H, Azagi T, Hoornstra D, et al. Control of Lyme borreliosis and other Ixodes ricinus-borne diseases. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2744-5

17. Bondarenko TE, Khokhlova ZA, Kudasheva SV, Etenko DA, Semyonov VA. Characteristic features of febrile states in infectious diseases transmitted by tick bites. Klinicheskaya Meditsina. 2021;99(9-10):521-530. (In Russ.) doi: 10.30629/0023-2149-2021-99-9-10-521-530

18. Platonov AE, Koetsveld J, Kolyasnikova NM, et al. Microbiological evidence of etiology of “Ixodes tick– borne borreliosis without erythema migrans” – Infection caused by Borrelia miyamotoi. Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika. 2017;16(1):29-35. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31631/2073-3046-2017-16-1-29-35

19. Liu W, Li H, Lu QB, et al. Candidatus Rickettsia tarasevichiae infection in Eastern Central China: A case series. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(10):641-648. doi: 10.7326/M15-2572

20. Jia N, Jiang JF, Huo QB, Jiang BG, Cao WC. Rickettsia sibirica subspecies sibirica BJ-90 as a cause of human disease. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(12):1176-1178. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1303625

21. Rudakov NV, Shpynov SN, Pen’evskaya NA, et al. Features of the epidemiological situation on tick-borne rickettsioses in the Russian Federation in 2010–2020 and prognosis for 2021. Problemy Osobo Opasnykh Infektsiy. 2021;(1):73-80. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21055/0370-1069-2021-1-73-80

22. Rudakov NV, Shtrek SV, Blokh AI, Penjevskaya NA, Shchuchinova LD. Possibility of serological verification of Siberian tick typhus with the test system for identification of Rickettsia conorii antibodies. Klinicheskaya Laboratornaya Diagnostika. 2019;64(9):553-559. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18821/0869-2084-2019-64-9-553-559

23. Mowla SJ, Drexler NA, Cherry CC, Annambholta PD, Kracalik IT, Basavaraju SV. Ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis among transfusion and transplant recipients in the United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021;27(11):2768–2775. doi: 10.3201/eid2711.211127

24. Kuriakose K, Pettit AC, Schmitz J, Moncayo A, Bloch KC. Assessment of risk factors and outcomes of severe ehrlichiosis infection. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(11):e2025577. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25577

25. Provorova VV, Krasnova EI, Khokhlova NI, Savel’eva MA, Filimonova ES, Kuznetsova VG. Old and new tick-borne infections in Russia. Infektsionnye Bolezni: Novosti, Mneniya, Obuchenie. 2019;8(2):102-112. (In Russ.) doi: 10.24411/2305-3496-2019-12013

26. Ayugin NI, Andaev EI, Nikitin AYa, Khankhareev SS, Istomina TF. Classification of municipalities in the Republic of Buryatia by the level of tick-borne viral encephalitis incidence. Problemy Osobo Opasnykh Infektsiy. 2022;(3):45-52. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21055/0370-1069-2022-3-45-52

27. Jaenson TG, Värv K, Fröjdman I, et al. First evidence of established populations of the taiga tick Ixodes persulcatus (Acari: Ixodidae) in Sweden. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1658-3