Hygienic Standardization of Daylight: Problems, Tasks, and International Experience (Literature Review)

Purpose. The purpose of the study was to analyze world experience and international practice of regulating natural lighting at schools and innovative solutions in this field. Results and discussions. The article presents the list of regulations of European countries regarding standard requirements for daylight and artificial lighting in residential and public buildings. The Daylight Factor (DF), which is the equivalent of the Russian natural illumination coefficient, varies from 0.8 to 5 per cent in different countries. The article describes lighting and insolation requirements for the daylight factor, light coefficient, combined discomfort indicator, light transmission coefficient, and light flux distribution in residential and public buildings, including comprehensive schools, in such countries as the United Kingdom, Germany, Greece, Poland, USA, Sweden, Cyprus, Netherlands, and Japan. The list of rated parameters of daylight both in the Russian Federation and in foreign countries is identical. At the same time, the requirements for natural lighting (DF, duration of insolation) in European standards are more stringent. The impact of daylight on schoolchildren's health and performance was the subject of research in Sweden and the United States. Their authors concluded that studying in classrooms without daylight could disrupt the basic hormonal background, affect the ability of children to concentrate attention and interact with each other, influence growth and the number of days missed due to illness. Conclusions. The analysis of international data proving the importance of daylight in forming optimal conditions for education and eyesight of schoolchildren and preventing health disorders enabled us to conclude on the necessity to launch scientific research into mathematical models of health risks for schoolchildren.

естественная освещенность, нормирование, инсоляция, влияние на здоровье, образовательные организации, daylight, standards, insolation, health effects, schools

1. Guide to DIN EN 12464-1, Lighting of work places -Part 1: Indoor work placе. FбIdeIgemeinschaft Gutes Licht. Available at: http://en.licht.de/fileadmin/Publications/ More_publications/1303_E_Guide-DIN-EN-12464-1_web. pdf (accessed: 04.04.2019).

2. Oteer AI, Kitada M, Dalaklis D, et al. Trends and challenges in maritime energy management. Springer, 2018;6. Available at: https://www.springer.com/gp/ book/9783319745756 (accessed: 5.04.2019). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-74576-3

3. Technische Regeln fur Arbeitsstatten Beleuchtung. ASR A3.4. Bundesrecht. Vom 29. April 2011 (GMBl S. 303). Zuletzt geandert durch die Bek. vom 10. April 2014. Available at: https://www.arbeitssicherheit.de/ schriften/dokument/0%3A4401370%2C1.html (accessed: 04.04.2019).

4. Internal Daylight Assessment 22 Marloes Road Project No: 8433 October 01, 2014, рр. 4-5. Available at: https://www.rbkc.gov.uk/idoxWAM/doc/Other-337600. pdf?extension=.pdf&id=1337600&location=Volume2& contentType=application/pdf&pageCount=1 (accessed: 03.05.2019).

5. Daylight calculations and measurements. VELUX. VKR Holding A/S [DK]. Available at: https://www. velux.com/deic/daylight/daylight-calculations-and-measurements#section1.7.1. (accessed: 04.04.2019).

6. Mardaljevic J, Andersen M, Roy N, et al. Daylighting metrics: Is there a relation between useful daylight illuminance and daylight glare probability? First Building Simulation and Optimization Conference Loughborough, UK 10-11 September 2012. Available at: http://www. ibpsa.org/proceedings/BSO2012/3B1.pdf (accessed: 4.04.2019).

7. Уйма А. Требования по освещению помещений в нормативных документах Республики Польша и их связь с энергосбережением // Жилищное строительство. 2015. № 6. C. 35-40

8. Darula S, Christoffersen J, Malikova M. Sunlight and insolation of building interiors. Energy Procedia. 2015; 78(11):1245 - 50. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.266.

9. Bournas I, Dubois M-C. Daylight regulation compliance of existing multi-family apartment blocks in Sweden. Build Environ. 2019; 150:254-265. DOI: 10.1016/j. buildenv.2019.01.013.

10. Дейнего В.Н. и др. Профилактика глазных заболеваний: светобиологическая безопасность и гигиена энергосберегающих источников света. Аналитический обзор // Глаз. 2016. Т. 1. № 107. С. 18-33 [Электронный ресурс]. Доступно по: http://cet.tatarstan. ru/file/File/ [1].pdf (ссылка активна на: 16.05.2019)

11. Edwards L, Torcellini PA. Literature review of the effects of natural light on building occupants. National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, CO. (US). 2002; Technical Report No. NREL/TP-550-30769. DOI: 10.2172/15000841

12. de Bruin-Hordijk T., de Groor E. Lighting in schools. 2012:10. Available at: https://docplayer.net/13848599-Lighting-in-schools-truus-de-bruin-hordijk-1-en-ellie-de-groot-2-1-climate-design-building-physics-faculty-of-architecture-tu-delft-the-netherlands.html (accessed: 16.05.2019)

13. Loysos G. An investigation into the relationship between daylighting and human performance. The condensed report. 20 of August, 1999. Pacific gas and electric company. Available at: https://h-m-g.com/downloads/ Daylighting/schoolc.pdf (accessed: 5.05.2019).

14. Земцов В.А., Гагарина Е.В. Методические принципы обеспечения нормированного регламента по естественному освещению на примере общеобразовательных школ //Вестник ВолгГАСУ. Сер.: Стр-во и архит. 2013. Вып. 31-2(50). С. 492-498.

15. Блинов В.А., Смирнов Л.Н., Блинов В.В. Совершенствование естественного освещения в жилых и офисных зданиях // Академический вестник УралНИИпроект РААСН. 2012. № 2. C. 23-26.

16. Соловьев А.К. Полые трубчатые световоды и их применение для естественного освещения зданий и экономия энергии. // Светотехника. 2011. № 5. С. 41-47.

17. Карасева Л.В., Лузина Ю.Л. Современные методы повышения естественной освещенности в уплотненной городской застройке // Молодой исследователь Дона. 2018. № 4(13) С. 56-60.