Preview

Public Health and Life Environment – PH&LE

Advanced search

Results of validating the proprietary method of establishing personal levels of vaccination adherence

https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2023-31-8-17-28

Abstract

Introduction: Vaccination is the most efficient and cost-effective way to prevent infectious diseases. In recent years, despite the proven positive role of vaccination, there has been an ambiguous attitude towards ongoing vaccination campaigns in the world.

Objective: To test and validate the proprietary method of establishing personal levels of vaccination adherence.

Materials and methods: The authors have elaborated a method of assessing vaccination adherence using a specially developed questionnaire consisting of four groups (scales) and including 36 both direct and indirect statements related to immunization and serving as indicators. In April–June 2023, we conducted a questionnaire-based survey of 300 people aged 19 to 75 years. The respondents were asked to rate their level of agreement with the statements using the Likert scale. Each indicator was a value calculated for a particular respondent, expressed in points. The scoring was done manually or automatically. The data were then analyzed in SPSS Statistics 23.0 using methods of correlation analysis and descriptive statistics.

Results: The vaccination adherence level was moderate in 179 (59.7 %), low in 9 (3.0 %), and high in 112 (37.3 %) respondents. The Spearman’s rank correlation analysis revealed statistically significant correlations between the responses and the actual level of commitment to vaccination. Our method has demonstrated compliance with standard requirements for internal consistency, factor validity of scales, and statistical significance of test parts (Cronbach’s α-coefficient = 0.830; the factor analysis allowed us to distinguish four components).

Conclusion: Testing and subsequent validation of the own method have made it possible to determine the level of vaccination adherence as moderate as the questionnaire scales correspond to significant factors influencing the choice of a behavioral strategy. This method can be recommended both for research purposes and for practical application in healthcare institutions.

About the Authors

D. V. Kaunina
Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health
Russian Federation

Daria V. Kaunina, Junior Researcher, Department of Public Health Research

Bldg 1, 12 Vorontsovo Pole Street, Moscow, 105064



T. P. Vasilieva
Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health
Russian Federation

Tatyana P. Vasilieva, Prof., Dr. Sci. (Med.), Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation, Head of the Research Direction “Theoretical Patterns of Public Health Formation and Health Maintenance”

Bldg 1, 12 Vorontsovo Pole Street, Moscow, 105064



S. V. Russkikh
Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health; NSE University
Russian Federation

Sergey V. Russkikh, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Leading Researcher, Department of Lifestyle Studies and Public Health Protection, N.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health; Associate Professor, Department of Theory and Practice of Public Administration, NSE University

Bldg 1, 12 Vorontsovo Pole Street, Moscow, 105064

20 Myasnitskaya Street, Moscow, 101000



References

1. Eliseeva AA. [Study of adherence to antihypertensive therapy in individuals with primary cerebral infarction.] Byulleten’ Meditsinskikh Internet-Konferentsiy. 2015;5(5):710. (In Russ.)

2. Amlaev KR, Zafirova VB, Uzdenov IM. Chealth education and adherence formation in socially vulnerable groups of tuberculosis patients. Tuberkulez i Bolezni Legkikh. 2014;(10):11-13. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21292/2075-1230-2014-0-10-93-104

3. Lebedev DA, Mosikian AA, Babenko AYu. Evaluation of factors influencing adherence to treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitor. Byulleten’ Sibirskoy Meditsiny. 2020;19(3):44-51. (In Russ.) doi: 10.20538/1682-0363-2020-3-44-51

4. Belova GV. [Adherence to treatment in hypertensive patients and the frequency of hypertensive crises.] Kardiovaskulyarnaya Terapiya i Profilaktika. 2019;18(S1):30-31. (In Russ.)

5. Strokova EV, Naumova EA, Schwartz YG. Influence of an internal picture of illness, coping-strategies and the self-relation of the patients after myocardial infarction on adherence to long treatment of coronary artery disease and its regularity. Sovremennye Issledovaniya Sotsial’nykh Problem. 2012;(1):1169-1190. (In Russ.)

6. Nikitina NM, Egorova EV, Melehina IF, Grigoryeva SN, Rebrov AP. Problems of treatment adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and comorbidity. Arkhiv Vnutrenney Meditsiny. 2020;10(5(55)):372-381. (In Russ.) doi: 10.20514/2226-6704-2020-10-5-372-381

7. Aremu TO, Oluwole OE, Adeyinka KO, Schommer JC. Medication adherence and compliance: Recipe for improving patient outcomes. Pharmacy (Basel). 2022;10(5):106. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy10050106

8. Fawcett J. Compliance: Definitions and key issues. J Clin Psychiatry. 1995;56 Suppl 1:4-8; discussion 9-10.

9. Jones CJ, Smith H, Llewellyn C. Evaluating the effectiveness of health belief model interventions in improving adherence: A systematic review. Health Psychol Rev. 2014;8(3):253-269. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2013.802623

10. Kardas P. Patient compliance with antibiotic treatment for respiratory tract infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002;49(6):897-903. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkf046

11. Swinnen E, Kerckhofs E. Compliance of patients wearing an orthotic device or orthopedic shoes: A systematic review. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2015;19(4):759-770. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2015.06.008

12. Tulepbergenova AA, Tekebayeva LA, Uteuliyev ES. Adherence of general practitioners to anticoagulant therapy in atrial fibrillation. Vestnik Kazakhskogo Natsional’nogo Meditsinskogo Universiteta. 2018;(3):360-362. (In Russ.)

13. Perepech NB, Mikhailova IE, Tregubov AV. Doctors’ adherence to the guidelines on the oral anticoagulants usage. Ratsional’naya Farmakoterapiya v Kardiologii. 2020;16(5):706-712. (In Russ.) doi: 10.20996/1819-6446-2020-10-15

14. Semenova ON, Naumova EA, Schwartz YG. Adherence to long-term treatment of cardiovascular disease and non-compliance with medical recommendations: The opinion of patients and physicians by the results of focused interview. Ratsional’naya Farmakoterapiya v Kardiologii. 2014;10(1):55-61. (In Russ.)

15. Feldblium IV, Bikmieva AV, Zakharova YuA, Yeresko SS, Melnik EN. Analysis of the compliance of the vaccination schedule against pneumococcal infection in young children. Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika. 2018;17(5(102)):111-120. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31631/2073-3046-2018-17-5-111-116

16. Kallon S, Samir S, Goonetilleke N. Vaccines: Underlying principles of design and testing. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021;109(4):987-999. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2207

17. Jarrett C, Wilson R, O’Leary M, Eckersberger E, Larson HJ; SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy. Strategies for addressing vaccine hesitancy – A systematic review. Vaccine. 2015;33(34):4180-4190. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.040

18. Avelino-Silva VI, Ferreira-Silva SN, Soares MEM, et al. Say it right: Measuring the impact of different communication strategies on the decision to get vaccinated. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):1162. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16047-2

19. Capodici A, Sanmarchi F, Bonaccorso N, Costantino C, Maietti E. The willingness toward vaccination: A focus on non-mandatory vaccinations. Vaccines (Basel). 2023;11(4):828. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11040828

20. Ghazy RM, Elkhadry SW, Abdel-Rahman S, et al. External validation of the parental attitude about childhood vaccination scale. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1146792. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1146792

21. Sarathchandra D, Navin MC, Largent MA, McCright AM. A survey instrument for measuring vaccine acceptance. Prev Med. 2018;109:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.01.006

22. Betsch C, Schmid P, Heinemeier D, Korn L, Holtmann C, Böhm R. Beyond confidence: Development of a measure assessing the 5C psychological antecedents of vaccination. PLoS One. 2018;13(12):e0208601. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208601

23. Gilkey MB, Magnus BE, Reiter PL, McRee AL, Dempsey AF, Brewer NT. The Vaccination Confidence Scale: a brief measure of parents’ vaccination beliefs. Vaccine. 2014;32(47):6259-6265. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.09.007

24. Gilkey MB, Reiter PL, Magnus BE, McRee AL, Dempsey AF, Brewer NT. Validation of the Vaccination Confidence Scale: A brief measure to identify parents at risk for refusing adolescent vaccines. Acad Pediatr. 2016;16(1):42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2015.06.007

25. Larson HJ, Jarrett C, Schulz WS, et al. Measuring vaccine hesitancy: The development of a survey tool. Vaccine. 2015;33(34):4165-4175. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.037

26. Larson HJ, de Figueiredo A, Xiahong Z, et al. The state of vaccine confidence 2016: Global insights through a 67-country survey. EBioMedicine. 2016;12:295-301. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.08.042

27. Shapiro GK, Tatar O, Dube E, et al. The vaccine hesitancy scale: Psychometric properties and validation. Vaccine. 2018;36(5):660-667. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.12.043

28. Frew PM, Murden R, Mehta CC, et al. Development of a US trust measure to assess and monitor parental confidence in the vaccine system. Vaccine. 2019;37(2):325-332. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.09.043

29. Rasskazova EI, Tkhostov ASh. Eagerness to be vaccinated against coronavirus as an indicator of trust to ofcial medical recommendations: The role of anxiety and beliefs. Natsional’nyy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal. 2021;(1(41)):76-90. (In Russ.) doi: 10.11621/npj.2021.0107

30. Li Y, Guo Y, Wu X, Hu Q, Hu D. The development and preliminary application of the Chinese version of the COVID-19 vaccine literacy scale. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(20):13601. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013601

31. Ushakova DA, Ushakova OV, Hripunova AA, Henkina LV, Omarova PO, Bammatmurzaeva KA. Evaluation of the awareness on relevant issues of the new coronavirus infection COVID-19 and the attitude to vaccination of the population of the Stavropol Region and the Republic of Dagestan. Mezhdunarodnyy Nauchno-Issledovatel’skiy Zhurnal. 2022;(6-2(120)):135-142. (In Russ.) doi: 10.23670/IRJ.2022.120.6.056

32. Dmitriev AV, Fedina NV, Tkachenko TG, Gudkov RA, Petrova VI, Zaplatnikov AL. Preventive vaccination compliance among medical students and pediatricians during the COVID-19 pandemic. Meditsinskiy Sovet. 2021;(11):202-209. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21518/2079-701X-2021-11-202-209

33. Briko NI, Mindlina AYa, Galina NP, Korshunov VA, Polibin RV. Adherence to immunoprevention: How to change the situation? Fundamentalʹnaya i Klinicheskaya Meditsina. 2019;4(4):8–18. (In Russ.) doi: 10.23946/2500-0764-2019-4-4-8-18

34. Bayanova TA, Petrova AG, Vanyarkina AS, Kupriyanova Yu, Gavrilova TA. Adherence population to vaccination of influenza: Survey results. Epidemiologiya I Vaktsinoprofilaktika. 2021;20(1):69–75. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31631/2073-3046-2021-20-1-69-75

35. Alimoradi Z, Lin CY, Pakpour AH. Worldwide Estimation of Parental Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccine for Their Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Vaccines (Basel). 2023;11(3):533. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11030533


Review

For citations:


Kaunina D.V., Vasilieva T.P., Russkikh S.V. Results of validating the proprietary method of establishing personal levels of vaccination adherence. Public Health and Life Environment – PH&LE. 2023;31(8):17-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2023-31-8-17-28

Views: 656


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2219-5238 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0788 (Online)