Etiological Structure of Leptospira interrogans in Natural Foci of the Baikal Region

Introduction: Studying the functioning of natural foci of leptospirosis, analyzing the structure of pathogens and the species composition of animal carriers are important parts of assessing the current epizootic situation in natural foci, necessary for planning and organizing anti-epidemic measures, including specific prevention of this bacterial disease.
Objective: To establish Leptospira interrogans serogroups in natural foci in the Baikal Region.
Materials and methods: In 2011–2021, we conducted zoological surveys of the territories of the Irkutsk Region within the borders of 10 administrative districts. In total, 1,255 small mammals of 36 species were caught in their natural habitats in accordance with the guidelines of the Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor). The animals belonged to five orders, including rodents (Rodentia) – 74.2 %, insectivores (Eulipotyphla) – 24.7 %, hares (Lagomorpha) – 0.6 %, predators (Carnivora) – 0.4 %, and bats (Chiroptera) – 0.2 %. Samples collected from the animals were tested using bacteriology, microscopy, and serology methods.
Results: Of all the samples collected, 2.3 % gave a positive test result for Leptospira interrogans. Its main carriers in the Baikal Region were representatives of the order of insectivores: tundra borer (Sorex tundrensis Merriam, 1900) and rodents: housekeeper vole (Alexandromys oeconomus Pallas, 1776), water vole (Arvicola amphibius Linnaeus, 1758), long-tailed ground squirrel (Urocitellus undulatus Pallas, 1779), muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus Linnaeus, 1766), and narrowcrusted vole (Lasiopodomys gregalis Pallas, 1779). The serogroups detected included Icterohaemorrhagiae, Grippotyphosa, Javanica, Australis, Pomona, Sejroe, Autumnalis, with the antibody titers ranging from 1:20 to 1:640.
Conclusions: Natural foci of leptospirosis are widespread in the Baikal Region. Compared with the results of studies conducted in the 20th century, the relative number of seropositive animals has increased slightly while the landscape of Leptospira serotypes has undergone changes.

1. Ananyina JuV. Human and animal leptospiroses: Prevalence trends and preventive measures. Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika. 2010;(2(51)):13-16. (In Russ.)

2. Adler B, de la Peña Moctezuma A. Leptospira and leptospirosis. Vet Microbiol. 2010;140(3-4):287-296. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.03.012

3. Asante J, Noreddin A, El Zowalaty ME. Systematic review of important bacterial zoonoses in Africa in the last decade in light of the 'One health' concept. Pathogens. 2019;8(2):50. doi: 10.3390/pathogens8020050

4. Delmas B, Jabot J, Chanarielle P, et al. Leptospirosis in ICU: A retrospective study of 134 consecutive admissions. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(1):93-99. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002825

5. Dhewantara PW, Mamun AA, Zhang WY, et al. Epidemiological shift and geographical heterogeneity in the burden of leptospirosis in China. Infect Dis Poverty. 2018;7(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s40249-018-0435-2

6. Epelboin L, Bourhy P, Le Turnier P, et al. [Leptospirosis in French Guiana and the Guiana shield: Current knowledge in 2016]. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2017;110(3):165-179. (In French.) doi: 10.1007/s13149-017-0559-9

7. Ludwig B, Zotzmann V, Bode C, Staudacher DL, Zschiedrich S. Lethal pulmonary hemorrhage syndrome due to Leptospira infection transmitted by pet rat. IDCases. 2017;8:84-86. doi: 10.1016/j.idcr.2017.04.016

8. Li JM, Li LM, Shi JF, et al. Prevalence of Leptospira in murine in China: A systematic review and meta- analysis. Front Vet Sci. 2022;9:944282. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.944282

9. Žele-Vengušt D, Lindtner-Knific R, Mlakar-Hrženjak N, Jerina K, Vengušt G. Exposure of free-ranging wild animals to zoonotic Leptospira interrogans Sensu Stricto in Slovenia. Animals (Basel). 2021;11(9):2722. doi: 10.3390/ani11092722

10. Breneva NV, Balakhonov SV. Endemicity and enzooticity aspects of leptospirosis. Zhurnal Mikrobiologii, Epidemiologii i Immunobiologii. 2019;(5):118-125. (In Russ.) doi: 10.36233/0372-9311-2019-5-118-125

11. Gorodin VN, Moysova DL, Bakhtina VA, Zotov SV. Trends of contemporary leptospirosis (review of literature). Epidemiologiya i Infektsionnye Bolezni. 2018;23(2):93-100. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18821/1560-9529-2018-23-2-93-100

12. Dmitriev PP. [Selected Chapters of Medical Zoology. Vertebrates in Natural Foci of Human Diseases: From Plague to COVID-19.] 2nd ed. Moscow: LENAND Publ.; 2021. (In Russ.)

13. Kiseleva EYu, Korzun VM, Borisov SA, et al. Current epidemiological situation on leptospirosis in the territories adjacent to Lake Baikal. Acta Biomedica Scientifica (East Siberian Biomedical Journal). 2021;6(5):57-67. (In Russ.) doi: 10.29413/ABS.2021-6.5.6

14. Soboleva GL, Ananyina YV, Nepoklonova IV. Actual problems of human and animal leptospirosis. Rossiyskiy Veterinarnyy Zhurnal. 2017;(8):14-18. (In Russ.)

15. Popov VV. [Terrestrial Vertebrates of the Irkutsk Regi¬on. Distribution and Protection.] Baikal Field Research Center “Wild Nature of Asia”. Irkutsk; 2015. (In Russ.)

16. Trankvilevskiy DV, Kvasov DA, Mescheryakova IS, et al. Questions organization monitoring the natural foci of infections are dangerous to humans: Planning, conducting and analyzing the results of field observations. Zdorov'e Naseleniya i Sreda Obitaniya. 2014;(8(257)):38-43. (In Russ.)

17. Trankvilevskiy DV. About infection of small mammals with pathogens of zoonoses in the Russian Federation. Zdorov'e Naseleniya i Sreda Obitaniya. 2016;(10(283)):53-56. (In Russ.)

18. Trankvilevskiy DV, Tsarenko VA, Zhukov VI. [Current situation on epizootological monitoring of natural foci of infections in the Russian Federation.] Meditsinskaya Parazitologiya i Parazitarnye Bolezni. 2016;(2):19-24. (In Russ.)

19. Nikitina AA, Koryakina LP. Etiological structure of leptospirosis circulated in populations of farm animals in Yakutia. Vestnik NGAU. 2022;(3(64)):111-117. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31677/2072-6724-2022-64-3-111-117

20. Gromov IM, Gureev AA, Novikov GA, et al. [Species Indicator of Fauna in the USSR. Issue 82 (Pt 1). Mammals of the USSR.] Moscow; Leningrad: USSR Academy of Sciences [Leningrad Branch] Publ.; 1963. (In Russ.)

21. Gromov IM, Polyakov IYa. [Voles (Microtinae). Fauna of the USSR. Mammals.] Leningrad: Nauka [Leningrad Branch] Publ.; 1977;III(8). (In Russ.)

22. Popov VV. Mammals of Irkutsk Region (annotated list). Baikal'skiy Zoologicheskiy Zhurnal. 2011;(1(6)):69-78. (In Russ.)

23. Yudin BS. [Insect-Eating Mammals of Siberia. Species Indicator. Academy of Sciences of the USSR.] Novosibirsk: Nauka (Siberian Branch) Publ.; 1971. (In Russ.)

24. Lisovsky AA, Sheftel BI, Savelyeva AP, et al. [Mammals of Russia: List of Species and Applied Aspects.] In: [Proceedings of the Zoological Museum of Moscow State University.] Vol. 56. Moscow: Association of Scientific Publications KMK; 2019. (In Russ.)