Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field Levels at Workplaces of Technical Specialists of Cellular Communication

Introduction: One of the main professional groups of workers in cellular radiotelephone communication includes technical specialists who serve and ensure trouble-free operation of radio transmitters of cellular base stations (BS). Transmitting antennas and BS equipment are powerful sources of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF EMFs) and one of the main adverse physical factors of the working environment for technicians. RF EMFs affect the functional state of various systems of the human body including the nervous, cardiovascular, and immune systems.

The objective of our study was to assess the exposure to RF EMFs of cellular communication technical specialists and to establish occupations with the highest exposure levels.

Materials and methods: Instrumental testing of energy flux density of the electromagnetic wave generated by BS receiving and transmitting equipment was carried out at service sites of cellular communication facilities by technical specialists of the industry. The time spent by technicians at workplaces with high EMF levels during the average work shift was measured.

Results: The analysis of collected data showed that 28 % of energy flux density values measured at workplaces exceeded the maximum permissible level for the personnel serving radio transmitters and spending from 12 to 61 % of the work shift in the specified conditions. We established that network construction engineers, network operation engineers, power engineers, technical audit specialists, network development engineers, and mechanics were exposed to increased RF EMF levels.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate the necessity to monitor and reduce occupational exposures of technical specialists of cellular communication in order to improve their working conditions and prevent, inter alia, RF EMS-related diseases.

1. Grigoriev YuG. [Human Electromagnetic Safety.] Russian National Committee for Protection against Non-Ionizing Radiation. 1999. (In Russian).

2. Grigoriev YuG, Grigoriev KA. The electromagnetic fields of the base stations of the mobile radio communication and ecology. The estimation of danger of the base station EMF for population and for bioecosystems. Radiatsionnaya Biologiya. Radioekologiya. 2005;45(6):726–731. (In Russian).

3. Grigoriev YuG. Significance of adequate information about the danger of cellular connection for health of population in the XXI century. Radiatsionnaya Biologiya. Radioekologiya. 2020;60(5):532–540. (In Russian). doi: 10.31857/S0869803120050045

4. Paltsev YuP, Pokhodzey LV, Rubtsova NB, Bogacheva EV. Problems of harmonization of sanitary regulations of the electromagnetic fields of mobile radio communications equipment. Gigiena i Sanitariya. 2013;92(3):39–42. (In Russian).

5. Dolan M, Rowley J. The precautionary principle in the context of mobile phone and base station radiofrequency exposures. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117(9):1329–32. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0900727

6. Elmas O. Effects of electromagnetic field exposure on the heart: a systematic review. Toxicol Ind Health. 2016;32(1):76–82. doi: 10.1177/0748233713498444

7. Grigoriev YuG. Ionizing and non-ionizing radiation (comparative risk estimations). Radiatsionnaya Biologiya. Radioekologiya. 2012;52(2):215–218. (In Russian).

8. Kesari KK, Kumar S, Nirala J, Siddiqui MH, Behari J. Biophysical evaluation of radiofrequency electromagnetic field effects on male reproductive pattern. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2013;65(2):85–96. doi: 10.1007/s12013-012-9414-6

9. Kovacic P, Somanathan R. Electromagnetic fields: mechanism, cell signaling, other bioprocesses, toxicity, radicals, antioxidants and beneficial effects. J Recept Signal Transduct Res. 2010;30(4):214–26. doi: 10.3109/10799893.2010.488650

10. Leitgeb N. Improved classification of evidence for EMF health risks. Health Phys. 2012;103(2):195–9. doi: 10.1097/HP.0b013e31825aa453

11. Naarala J, Höytö А, Markkanen А. Cellular effects of electromagnetic fields. Altern Lab Anim. 2004;32(4):355– 60. doi: 10.1177/026119290403200406

12. Nayyeri V, Hashemi SM, Borna M, Jalilian HR, Soleimani M. Assessment of RF radiation levels in the vicinity of 60 GSM mobile phone base stations in Iran. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2013;155(2):241–4. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncs319

13. Seitz H, Stinner D, Eikmann Th, Herr C, Röösli M. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) and subjective health complaints associated with electromagnetic fields of mobile phone communication – a literature review published between 2000 and 2004. Sci Total Environ. 2005;349(1–3):45–55. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.05.009

14. Vanderstraeten J. [GSM fields and health: an updated literature review.] Rev Med Brux. 2009;30(4):416–24. (In French).

15. Yashchenko SG, Rybalko SYu. [Monitoring of the electromagnetic environment in health resort areas of Crimea.] Vestnik Fizioterapii i Kurortologii. 2018;24(1): 132. (In Russian).

16. Kasyanova VV, Vashchenko VV, Cherkessova LV. Influence of network towers on human health. Molodoy Issledovatel’ Dona. 2019;(3(18)):15–18. (In Russian).

17. Navumau AD. The impact of high frequency electromagnetic fields on the nervous system. Vestnik Vitebskogo Gosudarstvennogo Meditsinskogo Universiteta. 2020;19(4):7–13. (In Russian). doi: 10.22263/2312-4156.2020.4.7

18. Shibkova DZ, Shilkova TV, Ovchinnikova AV, Yefimova NV. Cytogenetic effects of electromagnetic radiation of radio-frequency range on irradiated experimental animals and their posterity. Radiatsionnaya Biologiya. Radioekologiya. 2018;58(6):646–652. (In Russian). doi: 10.1134/S0869803118060115

19. Demidov VP, Demidov AV. Ensuring electromagnetic safety during design, construction, reconstruction and operation of industrial and civil facilities. Vestnik Grazhdanskikh Inzhenerov. 2019;(3(74)):242–248. (In Russian). doi: 10.23968/1999-5571-2018-16-3-242-248

20. Sedov DS, Makhina VI, Ivanchenko MN. [Influence of electromagnetic radiation generated by mobile devices on human health.] Byulleten’ Meditsinskikh InternetKonferentsiy. 2012;2(11):918–919. (In Russian).

21. Mordachev VI. Electromagnetic background created by base and mobile radio stations of cellular communications. Doklady BGUIR. 2016;(1(95)):38–44. (In Russian).

22. Lutsenko LA, Egorova AM, Gvozdeva LL, Turdyev RV. [Issue of hygienic safety of cellular communication]. In: Hygiene, Toxicology, Occupational Pathology: Traditions and Modernity: Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with international participation, Moscow, November 9–10, 2016. Popova AYu, Rakitsky VN, eds. Moscow: Dashkov & Co Publ., 2016:139–143. (In Russian).

23. Shuvalova EA, Tyurina AA, Orekhova AYu. Modern trends in the development of finishing construction materials for protection against electromagnetic radiation radio frequency. Natsional’naya Assotsiatsiya Uchenykh (NAU). 2017;(6(33)):47–49. (In Russian).

24. Perov SYu, Bogacheva EV. Comparison of portable communication evaluation: Russian and international approaches. Meditsina Truda i Promyshlennaya Ekologiya. 2012;(3):36–40. (In Russian).

25. Dzhanaev SAB, Alisheva AE, Tsyguta AN. Methods for determining the level of the electromagnetic field of wireless communication systems and their conformity to the requirements of sanitary standards. Nauchnyy Rezul’tat. Informatsionnye Tekhnologii. 2018;3(1):43–52. (In Russian). doi: 10.18413/2518-1092-2018-3-1-43-52

26. Globa MD, Nasluzova OI. [Antennas for receiving and transmitting cellular signals.] Epokha Nauki. 2015;(4):140. (In Russian).

27. Zubarev YuB, Samoilov AG. [About the development of mobile communications of the fifth generation.] In: Advanced Technologies in the Means of Information Transmission – PTSPI-2017: Proceedings of the 12th International Scientific and Technical Conference, Suzdal, July 5–7, 2017. Vladimir: Vladimirskiy Gosudarstvennyy Universitet Publ., 2017:5–10. (In Russian).

28. Egorova AM, Lutsenko LA. [Actual problems of hygienic safety of cellular base stations.] In: Topical Issues of Organization of Control and Supervision of Physical Factors: Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference, Moscow, May 25–26, 2017. Popova AYu, ed. Moscow: Dashkov & Co. Publ., 2017:105–108. (In Russian).

29. Zvezdina MYu, Shokov AV, Shokova YuA, Lebedev AR. Electromagnetic radiation security estimation on the residential building roof for cellular antenna. Vestnik Donskogo Gosudarstvennogo Tekhnicheskogo Universiteta. 2015;15(3(82)):102–110. (In Russian). doi: 10.12737/12591

30. Svistunov AS. Estimation of electromagnetic background level created by base and mobile stations of cellular radionetworks in urban area with high density of population. Doklady BGUIR. 2018;(6(116)):26–31. (In Russian).