Age-Specific Dynamics of Chronic Disease Rates among Shipbuilding Workers
https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2026-34-5-78-86
Abstract
Introduction: Working conditions in shipbuilding and ship repair are notorious for intense exposure to a whole range of occupational risk factors. To assess their health impact, it is expedient to use a method for assessing the age-specific dynamics of chronic disease risk based on the annual risk increment.
Objective: To assess the dynamics of chronic disease accumulation with age in workers of different occupational groups at shipbuilding facilities.
Materials and Methods: We used the results of a medical examination of 1,638 men and women employed at five shipbuilding and ship repair facilities in St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region divided into two occupational groups: blue-collar workers and managers. Working conditions were assessed based on the officially published results of a special assessment of working conditions at these facilities for 2022–2025. Statistical data analysis was performed using SPSS 11.5 and Microsoft Excel 2010.
Results: Our analysis of the findings of the special assessment of working conditions revealed persistently high levels of occupational hazards, including noise, chemical pollution, and heavy physical work, all posing health risks to shipwrights. Periodic medical examinations showed a predominance of diseases of the circulatory system (22 %), primarily arterial hypertension, and bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (13 %), which requires increased attention to at-risk workers.
Conclusion: Working conditions of ship fitters, assemblers, woodcutters, and other core personnel are of hazard levels 2 to 3. The assessment of age-specific disease burden using the annual risk increment criterion revealed an accelerated accumulation of chronic conditions in production department managers compared to blue-collar workers. The findings will be used to develop preventive measures aimed at maintaining health and longevity of shipbuilding and ship repair workers.
About the Authors
Mara N. KirʹyanovaRussian Federation
Marina N. Kirʹyanova, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Senior Researcher, Department of Occupational Health,
4, 2nd Sovetskaya Street, Saint Petersburg, 191036.
Aleksandr A. Kovshov
Russian Federation
Aleksandr A. Kovshov, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Acting Head of the Department of Hygiene, Leading Researcher; Associate Professor, Department for Hygiene of Educational, Training, and Labor Conditions, and Radiation Hygiene,
4, 2nd Sovetskaya Street, Saint Petersburg, 191036.
Aleksandr N. Nikanov
Russian Federation
Aleksandr N. Nikanov, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Scientific Department of Occupational Diseases,
4, 2nd Sovetskaya Street, Saint Petersburg, 191036.
Gennady A. Sorokin
Russian Federation
Gennady A. Sorokin, Dr. Sci. (Biol.), Leading Researcher, Department of Hygiene,
4, 2nd Sovetskaya Street, Saint Petersburg, 191036.
Nikolay D. Chistyakov
Russian Federation
Nikolay D. Chistyakov, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Dermatovenereologist, Clinical Research Department,
4, 2nd Sovetskaya Street, Saint Petersburg, 191036.
References
1. Krasilnikov AB. Towards the study of modern Russ ian shipbuilding trends. Progressivnaya Ekonomika. 2024;(12):211-221. (In Russ.) doi: 10.54861/27131211_2024_12_211
2. Shashev AV, Gudkov AE. On the prospects of industrial implementation of laser technology in shipbuilding. In: New Technologies in Shipbuilding NTS-2024: Proceedings of the III Branch Scientific and Technical Conference, St. Petersburg, November 21–22, 2024. St. Petersburg: Center for Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Technology JSC; 2024:219-230. (In Russ.)
3. Meleshin MA, Salamekh A, Alsaid M. Experience in application of composite materials in shipbuilding. Vestnik Astrakhanskogo Gosudarstvennogo Tekhnicheskogo Universiteta. Seriya: Morskaya Tekhnika i Tekhnologiya. 2022;(2):44-50. (In Russ.) doi: 10.24143/2073-1574-2022-2-44-50
4. Savchenko OV, Polovinkin VN. The current state, problems and prospects of domestic commercial shipbuilding. Trudy Krylovskogo Gosudarstvennogo Nauchnogo Tsentra. 2022;(3(401)):152-164. (In Russ.) doi: 10.24937/2542-2324-2022-3-401-152-164
5. Nikanov AN, Kaminsky MA, Rocheva II, et al. Health status of shipyard workers according to results of medical examinations. Ekologiya Cheloveka (Human Ecology). 2008;(6):24-26. (In Russ.)
6. Shapovalova MA, Mamedov IG. Morbidity of workers of shipbuilding and ship-repair production. Byulleten’ Natsional’nogo Nauchno-Issledovatel’skogo Instituta Obshchestvennogo Zdorov’ya Imeni N.A. Semashko. 2018;(2):87-92. (In Russ.)
7. Trofimova MV. Аnalysis of working conditions and occupational morbidity of chipyard workers. Meditsina Truda i Promyshlennaya Ekologiya. 2015;(9):142-143. (In Russ.)
8. Chashchin МV, Atabekov AI, Kayk ЕА, Gudkov АB, Popova ON. Hygienic characteristics of the air pollution in the welding working area in shipbuilding (the case of St. Petersburg shipyards). Zhurnal Mediko-Biologicheskikh Issledovaniy. 2023;11(4):451-461. (In Russ.) doi: 10.37482/2687-1491-Z163
9. Mal’kova NYu, Petrova MD. Results of implementing preventive health measures for workers of certain occupations in the shipbuilding industry. Zdorov’e Naseleniya i Sreda Obitaniya. 2022;30(5):51-56. (In Russ.) doi: 10.35627/2219-5238/2022-30-5-51-56
10. Ilyin SM, Samarskaya NA, Simanovich SV. Vertical risk profile in shipbuilding and ship repair: Occupational safety in a multi-level production environment. Ekonomika Truda. 2025;12(7):1093-1110. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18334/et.12.7.123378
11. Arefyeva DV, Baltrukova TB, Stepanov VV, Kozhukhova NA, Shayakhmetova AA. Hygienic assessment of the working conditions of personnel of nuclear shipbuilding and ship repair enterprises when handling radioactive waste. Meditsina Truda i Promyshlennaya Ekologiya. 2025;65(3):165-173. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31089/1026-9428-2025-65-3-165-173
12. Kalyani S, Bicholkar AU, Cacodcar JA, et al. Morbidities among shipbuilding workers in Goa: A retrospective record-based study. Epidem Int. 2019;4(2):23-28. doi: 10.24321/2455.7048.201908
13. ISO 45003:2021, Occupational health and safety management – Psychological health and safety at work – Guidelines for managing psychosocial risks. Geneva: ISO; 2021. Accessed May 12, 2026. https://www.iso.org/ru/standard/64283.html
14. Kir’yanova MN, Sorokin GA, Chistyakov ND, Kovshov AA. Рsychosocial factors of working conditions as a cause of fatigue and health impairments in workers. In: Buzinov RV, Frolova NM, eds. Current Issues of Hygiene and Occupational Diseases: Proceedings of the Russian Scientific and Practical Conference, St. Petersburg, October 24–25, 2024. St. Petersburg: Kosta 3D LLC; 2024:108-114. (In Russ.)
15. Searle SD, Mitnitski A, Gahbauer EA, Gill TM, Rockwood K. A standard procedure for creating a frailty index. BMC Geriatr. 2008;8(1):24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-8-24
16. Rockwood K, Mitnitski A. Frailty in relation to the accumulation of deficits. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62(7):722-727. doi: 10.1093/gerona/62.7.722
17. Dalgaard CJ, Hansen CW, Strulik H. Physiological aging around the World. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(6):e0268276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268276
18. Hansen CW, Dalgaard CJ, Strulik HI. Physiological aging and life-cycle labor supply across countries. PLoS ONE. 2023;18(11):e0294952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294952
19. Sorokin GA, Syurin SA, Kiryanova MN. Age trend in risks for the chronic diseases in miners and metallurgists of the Kola Arctic. Gigiena i Sanitariya. 2025;104(1): 63-70. (In Russ.) doi: 10.47470/0016-9900-2025-104-1-63-70
20. Sorokin GA, Chistyakov ND, Kir’yanova MN, Loginova NN. The difference in the age and length of service dynamics of morbidity is a criterion for assessing the relationship between the health of workers and the profession. Zdorov’e – Osnova Chelovecheskogo Potentsiala: Problemy i Puti Ikh Resheniya. 2023;18(1):216-223. (In Russ.)
21. Grimitlin AM, Pozin GM. [Air exchange in workshops of shipbuilding plants.] Santekhnika, Otoplenie, Konditsionirovanie. 2014;(1(145)):106-108. (In Russ.)
22. Klimova PA, Pisarenko OV. The problem of personnel shortage in the industrial sector: Causes and solutions. Diskussiya. 2024;(12(133)):258-265. (In Russ.) doi: 10.46320/2077-7639-2024-12-133-258-265
23. Popovich MV, Manshina AV, Kontsevaya AV, Drapkina OM. Corporate worker health promotion programs – Review of foreign publications. Profilakticheskaya Meditsina. 2020;23(3):156-161. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17116/profmed202023031156
24. Timoshevsky AA, Glukhova YuO. Trends in the study of risk factors and preventive measures for chronic noncommunicable diseases (literature review). Zdravookhranenie Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 2025;69(6):554-560. (In Russ.) doi: 10.47470/0044-197X-2025-69-6-554-560
Review
For citations:
Kirʹyanova M.N., Kovshov A.A., Nikanov A.N., Sorokin G.A., Chistyakov N.D. Age-Specific Dynamics of Chronic Disease Rates among Shipbuilding Workers. Public Health and Life Environment – PH&LE. 2026;34(5):78-86. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2026-34-5-78-86
JATS XML

.png)

























