

Hygienic Assessment of the Relationship between the Levels of Endocrine- Disrupting Metals in Drinking Water and Biological Materials and the Prevalence of Endocrine Diseases in the Population
https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2025-33-2-53-62
Abstract
Background: In addition to carcinogenic and toxic properties, some metals can act as endocrine disruptors in small doses, when taken both separately and in combination.
Objective: To conduct a hygienic assessment of the relationship between the levels of endocrine-disrupting metals in drinking water and human hair and the incidence and prevalence of endocrine diseases.
Materials and methods: We did a cluster analysis of 41 municipalities of the Orenburg Region with the allocation of observation and reference areas based on disease rates and measured levels of disrupting metals. The contents of ten endocrine-disrupting metals (aluminum, iron, manganese, copper, lead, zinc, chromium, nickel, mercury, cadmium) in drinking water and eight trace elements in hair samples were assessed. We examined 41 and 46 people living in the observation and reference areas, respectively.
Results: In the observation area, the prevalence in the adult population was 1.4 times higher, the incidence was 1.7 times higher, and the pollution coefficients due to disrupting metals were 1.5-2 times higher than in the reference area. The priority endocrine-disrupting metals were lead, iron, cadmium, nickel, and aluminum. Hair levels of iron, manganese, lead, chromium, and cadmium in those living in the observation area exceeded the reference ones. Incidence rates of diseases of the endocrine system demonstrated a weak statistically significant correlation with the contents of cadmium, lead, iron, and aluminum. Hair levels of iron, copper, lead, cadmium, and chromium in the examined subjects correlated with the prevalence in children and adults.
Conclusion: The subjects living in the areas with a high incidence of endocrine diseases had higher hair levels of iron, copper, lead, chromium, and nickel compared to those living in the reference area. The positive correlations found in the “health status environmental factor marker of exposure” system require further research to identify patterns and cause-and-effect relationships.
About the Authors
D. A. KryazhevRussian Federation
Dmitrii A. Kryazhev, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Department of General Hygiene
6 Sovetskaya Street, Orenburg, 460014
T. V. Boeva
Russian Federation
Tatyana V. Boeva, Postgraduate, Department of General Hygiene
6 Sovetskaya Street, Orenburg, 460014
V. M. Boev
Russian Federation
Viktor M. Boev, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Prof., Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Honored Worker of the Higher School of the Russian Federation; Head of the Department of General Hygiene
6 Sovetskaya Street, Orenburg, 460014
D. S. Karmanova
Russian Federation
Daria S. Karmanova, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Department of Chemistry
6 Sovetskaya Street, Orenburg, 460014
E. L. Borshchuk
Russian Federation
Evgeni L. Borshchuk, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Prof.; Head of the Department of Public Health and Healthcare No. 1
6 Sovetskaya Street, Orenburg, 460014
References
1. Kuznetsov EV, Zhukova LA, Pahomova EA, Gulamov AA. Endocrine diseases as medical-social prolem of today. Sovremennye Problemy Nauki i Obrazovaniya. 2017;(4):62. (In Russ.)
2. Gadzhikerimov GE, Al-Zrer KM. The main trends in the incidence of children from birth to 14 years old in the Russian Federation. Rossiyskiy Pediatricheskiy Zhurnal. 2020;23(6):396. (In Russ.)
3. Banteva MN, Manoshkina EM, Kuznetsova VP. Trends of morbidity and chronization index in female teenagers in the Russian Federation. Klinicheskaya Meditsina i Farmakologiya. 2019;5(3):38-44. (In Russ.) doi: 10.12737/article_5db94d5fd3e4f8.93824740
4. Korneva KG, Strongin LG, Almazova AM, et al. Risk factors for the manifestation of type 1 diabetes mellitus in children in the Volga region. Endokrinologiya. Novosti. Mneniya. Obuchenie. 2019;8(4):7-14. (In Russ.) doi: 10.24411/2304-9529-2019-14001
5. Luzhetsky KP, Tsinker MYu, Vekovshinina SA. Structural and dynamic analysis of endocrine pathology in the Russian Federation with different levels of spectrum and environmental pollution. Zdorov'e Naseleniya i Sreda Obitaniya. 2017;(5(290)):7-11. (In Russ.) doi: 10.35627/2219-5238/2017-290-5-7-11
6. Khamidulina KhKh, Tarasova EV, Zamkova IV, et al. International approaches to hazard assessment and classification of endocrine disruptors. Gigiena i Sanitariya. 2021;100(12):1372-1376. (In Russ.) doi: 10.47470/0016-9900-2021-100-12-1372-1376
7. Denuzière A, Ghersi-Egea JF. Cerebral concentration and toxicity of endocrine disrupting chemicals: The implication of blood-brain interfaces. NeuroToxicology. 2022;91:100-118. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2022.04.004
8. Rana SVS. Perspectives in endocrine toxicity of heavy metals – A review. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2014;160(1):1- 14. doi: 10.1007/s12011-014-0023-7
9. World Health Organization. Identification of Risks from Exposure to Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals at the Country Level. WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2014. Accessed October 3, 2023. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/344588/9789289050142-eng.pdf?sequence=1
10. Luzhetskiy KP. Methodical approaches to managing risks for endocrine diseases evolvement in children related to impacts of environmental factors occuring on areas aimed for development. Health Risk Analysis. 2017;(2):45-53. doi: 10.21668/health.risk/2017.2.05.eng
11. Overview Report I: A Compilation of Lists of Chemicals Recognised as Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals (EDCs) or Suggested as Potential EDCs. International Panel on Chemical Pollution; 2016. Accessed October 3, 2023. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/31759/IPCP.docx
12. Karthikeyan BS, Ravichandran J, Mohanraj K, Vivek-Ananth RP, Samal A. A curated knowledgebase on endocrine disrupting chemicals and their biological systems-level perturbations. Sci Total Environ. 2019;692:281-296. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.225
13. Byrne C, Divekar SD, Storchan GB, Parodi DA, Martin MB. Metals and breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2013;(18):63-73. doi: 10.1007/s10911-013-9273-9
14. Aquino NB, Sevigny MB, Sabangan J, Louie MC. The role of cadmium and nickel in estrogen receptor signaling and breast cancer: Metalloestrogens or not? J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2012;30(3):189-224. doi: 10.1080/10590501.2012.705159
15. Karthikeyan BS, Ravichandran J, Aparna SR, Samal A. DEDuCT 2.0: An updated knowledgebase and an exploration of the current regulations and guidelines from the perspective of endocrine disrupting chemicals. Chemosphere. 2021;267:128898. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128898
16. Darbre PD. The history of endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Curr Opin Endocr Metab Res. 2019;7:26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.coemr.2019.06.007
17. Fuhrman VF, Tal A, Arnon S, Why endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) challenge tra¬ditional risk assessment and how to respond. J Hazard Mater. 2015;286:589-611. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.12.012
18. Tinkov AA, Popova EV, Nikonorov AA. Influence of iron sulfate on adipose tissue endocrine dysfunction in Wistar rats. Kazanskiy Meditsinskiy Zhurnal. 2013;94(5):760-763. (In Russ.) Accessed February 17, 2025. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vliyanie-sulfata-zheleza-na-endokrinnuyu-disfunktsiyu-zhirovoy-tkani-krys-linii-wistar
19. Lebedeva EN, Krasikov SI, Borshchuk EL, Karmanova DS, Chesnokova LA, Iskakov AG. Effects of Fe 2+ on the adipokine regulation and extent of oxidative stress. Gigiena i Sanitariya. 2015;94(4):48-51. (In Russ.) Accessed October 3, 2023. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vliyanie-fe-2-na-adipokinovuyu-regulyatsiyu-i-vyrazhennost-okislitelnogo-stressa
20. Atmakusuma TD, Hasibuan FD, Purnamasari D. The correlation between iron overload and endocrine function in adult transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia patients with growth retardation. J Blood Med. 2021;12:749-753. doi: 10.2147/JBM.S325096
21. Timokhina EP, Nazimova SV, Tsomartova DA, Yaglova NV, Obernikhin SS, Yaglov VV. Morphological and cytophysiological changes in the adult rat adrenal medulla after prenatal and postnatal exposure to endocrine disrupting DDT. Modern Technologies in Medicine. 2020;12(2):50- 55. doi: 10.17691/stm2020.12.2.06
22. Skalny AV, Kiselev MF, eds. [Elemental Status of the Russian Population. Part 4. Elemental Status of the Population of the Volga and Ural Federal Districts.] St. Petersburg: Medkniga ELBI-SPb; 2013. (In Russ.)
23. Khamidulina KhKh, Dorofeeva YeV. Endocrine disruptors. Present status of the problem. Toksikologicheskiy Vestnik. 2013;(2(119)):51-54. (In Russ.)
24. Gonsioroski A, Mourikes VE, Flaws JA. Endocrine disruptors in water and their effects on the reproductive system. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(6):1929. doi: 10.3390/ijms21061929
25. Gore AC, Chappell VA, Fenton SE, et al. EDC-2: The Endocrine Society’s second scientific statement on endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Endocr Rev. 2015;36(6):E1- E150. doi: 10.1210/er.2015-1010
26. Vandenberg LN, Colborn T, Hayes TB, et al. Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: Low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses. Endocr Rev. 2012;33(3):378-455. doi: 10.1210/er.2011-1050
27. Sinitsyna OO, Rakhmanin YuA, Zholdakova ZI, et al. Epidemiological, toxicological and moleсular-genetic aspects of endocrine disrupting chemicals in the chemical safety problem. Gigiena i Sanitariya. 2018;97(3):197-203. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18821/0016-9900-2018-97-3-197-203
Review
For citations:
Kryazhev D.A., Boeva T.V., Boev V.M., Karmanova D.S., Borshchuk E.L. Hygienic Assessment of the Relationship between the Levels of Endocrine- Disrupting Metals in Drinking Water and Biological Materials and the Prevalence of Endocrine Diseases in the Population. Public Health and Life Environment – PH&LE. 2025;33(2):53-62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2025-33-2-53-62