Ambient Air Quality in an Industrial City in the Subjective Perception of Its Residents

Introduction: Perceived air quality and satisfaction with it are significant components of the subjective quality of life in the population of modern cities that affect self-rated well-being and overall life satisfaction.
Objective: Theoretical validation of the construct “satisfaction with ambient air quality” that includes the subjective importance of air quality, its perceived quality and acceptability, and its testing within an empirical research in a Russian industrial city.
Materials and methods: In March 2023, we conducted a qualitative sociological research that consisted of 17 guided interviews with residents of Novosibirsk aged 18 and older. Text analysis was carried out using axial coding.
Results: The analysis of the interviews showed that the structural elements of the theoretical construct of satisfaction are present in everyday consciousness, especially when informants describe the quality of ambient air in their city. Yet, the elements were found to be often mixed and replaced with one another. The categories of “relevance” and “acceptability” were difficult to understand. The respondents could be divided into three groups: 1) those who unambiguously characterize the urban air quality, 2) those who refuse to talk about the city as a whole, focusing on more and less polluted areas, and 3) those who describe the quality of ambient air in Novosibirsk by comparing it with other Russian cities. We noted an adverse effect of ambient air quality on physical and mental health of the residents. Sources of air pollution were defined by the respondents in a fairly general way, e.g. “industrial enterprises”, “landfills, household activities”. Some talked about the advantages of living in the city, which compensate for air pollution. The informants often focused on discussing ways to improve air quality, which can be a marker of community outrage.
Conclusion: It is easier for the population to talk about ambient air by interpreting its condition. Most respondents agree that the air quality in their place of residence is rather poor. Overall, the perceived air quality and satisfaction are intersecting but not identical constructs. Negative perception of air quality does not necessarily mean dissatisfaction, especially in the presence of compensating factors.

1. Bell ML, Peng RD, Dominici F. The exposure–response curve for ozone and risk of mortality and the adequacy of current ozone regulations. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114(4):532-536. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8816

2. Bateson TF, Schwartz J. Who is sensitive to the effects of particulate air pollution on mortality? A case-crossover analysis of effect modifiers. Epidemiology. 2004;15(2):143-149. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000112210.68754.fa

3. Turner MC, Jerrett M, Pope 3rd CA, et al. Long-term ozone exposure and mortality in a large prospective study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193(10):1134–1142. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201508-1633OC

4. Lelieveld J, Pozzer A, Pöschl U, Fnais M, Haines A, Münzel T. Loss of life expectancy from air pollution compared to other risk factors: A worldwide perspective. Cardiovasc Res. 2020;116(11):1910-1917. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvaa025

5. McConnell R, Berhane K, Gilliland F, et al. Asthma in exercising children exposed to ozone: A cohort study. Lancet. 2002;359(9304):386–391. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07597-9

6. Al-Kindi SG, Brook RD, Biswal S, Rajagopalan S. Environmental determinants of cardiovascular disease: lessons learned from air pollution. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020;17(10):656–672. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-0371-2

7. Genc S, Zadeoglulari Z, Fuss SH, Genc K. The adverse effects of air pollution on the nervous system. J Toxicol. 2012;2012:782462. doi: 10.1155/2012/782462

8. Liu H, Hu T. How does air quality affect residents’ life satisfaction? Evidence based on multiperiod follow-up survey data of 122 cities in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021;28(43):61047-61060. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15022-x

9. Han A, Ten G K, Wang S. Gray skies and blue moms: The effect of air pollution on parental life satisfaction. World Dev. 2023;163:106151. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106151

10. Wu L, Chen C. Does pattern matter? Exploring the pathways and effects of urban green space on promoting life satisfaction through reducing air pollution. Urban For Urban Green. 2023;82:127890. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127890

11. Ferreira S, Akay A, Brereton F, et al. Life satisfaction and air quality in Europe. Ecol Econ. 2013;88:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.027

12. Orru K, Orru H, Maasikmets M, Hendrikson R, Ainsaar M. Well-being and environmental quality: Does pollution affect life satisfaction? Qual Life Res. 2016;25(3):699-705. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1104-6

13. Lin WH, Pan WC, Yi CC. “Happiness in the air?” the effects of air pollution on adolescent happiness. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):795. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7119-0

14. Frank MR, Mitchell L, Dodds PS, Danforth CM. Happiness and the patterns of life: A study of geolocated tweets. Sci Rep. 2013;3:2625. doi: 10.1038/srep02625

15. Sanduijav Ch, Ferreira S, Filipski M, Hashida Y. Air pollution and happiness: Evidence from the coldest capital in the world. Ecol Econ. 2021;187:107085. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107085

16. Niu Z, Zhai M, Dong Y, et al. Association between air quality satisfaction, family relationships, and depression symptoms among middle-aged and elderly Chinese people: The mediation role of perceived health status. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):2439. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14711-7

17. Liao PS, Shaw D, Lin YM. Environmental quality and life satisfaction: Subjective versus objective measures of air quality. Soc Indic Res. 2015;124:599-616. doi: 10.1007/s11205-014-0799-z

18. Shi X, Li X, Chen X, Zhang L. Objective air quality index versus subjective perception: Which has a greater impact on life satisfaction? Environ Dev Sustain. 2022;24:6860-6877. doi: 10.1007/s10668-021-01730-4

19. Zhu J, Lu C, Wei Z. Perception of air pollution and the evaluation of local governments’ environmental governance: An empirical study on China. Atmosphere. 2023;14(2):212. doi: 10.3390/atmos14020212

20. Li J. Research on the Relationship among Perceived Air Quality, Public Satisfaction and Environmental Behavior Intention. China Jiliang University; 2016:1-96.

21. Zheng Y, Sun Y, Ji M, Zhang X. Air quality perception satisfaction and influence factors analysis in Shandong, China. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 2021;651:042020. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/651/4/042020

22. Koshkin EO. Analysis of the results of monitoring the state of the urban environment of the city of Novosibirsk using the example of atmospheric air. Regulirovanie Zemel’no-Imushchestvennykh Otnosheniy v Rossii: Pravovoe i Geoprostranstvennoe Obespechenie, Otsenka Nedvizhimosti, Ekologiya, Tekhnologicheskie Resheniya. 2022;(2):87-93. (In Russ.) doi: 10.33764/2687-041X-2022-2-87-93

23. Gann TM, Matlock T. The semantics of climate change and global warming. Cogn Sci. 2014;36:505-510.

24. Shi W, Fu H, Wang P, Chen C, Xiong J. #Climatechange vs. #Globalwarming: Characterizing two competing climate discourses on Twitter with semantic network and temporal analyses#. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(3):1062. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17031062

25. Tsvetkova OL. Fear and modernity: metaphysics and reality. Kul’tura i Obrazovanie. 2018;(1(28)):5-13. (In Russ.)

26. Reames TG, Bravo MA. People, place and pollution: Investigating relationships between air quality perceptions, health concerns, exposure, and individual- and area-level characteristics. Environ Int. 2019;122:244-255. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.11.013

27. Sandman PM. Responding to Community Outrage: Strategies for Effective Risk Communication. 5th ed. AIHA Press; 2003:213-216.

28. Zeng J, Jiang M, Yuan M. Environmental risk perception, risk culture, and pro-environmental behavior. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(5):1750. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051750

29. Ejelöv E, Nilsson A. Individual factors influencing acceptability for environmental policies: A review and research agenda. Sustainability. 2020;12(6):2404. doi: 10.3390/su12062404

30. Floyd MF, Jang H, Noe FP. The relationship between environmental concern and acceptability of environmental impacts among visitors to two U.S. National Park settings. J Environ Manage. 1997;51(4):391-412. doi: 10.1006/jema.1997.0151