Risk Assessment of Occupational Noise-Induced Hearing Loss among Maritime Personnel of Novoship PJSC

Background: Diseases induced by such physical factors as noise and vibration rank high in the structure of occupational disorders; their proportion increased from 36.6 % in 2004 to 51.15 % in the year 2019.
Objective: To assess risks of hearing loss among the seafaring personnel of Novoship PJSC exposed to occupational noise.
Materials and methods: The observation group included men with 10, 20 and 30 years of work experience. In accordance with generally accepted methods, an a priori occupational risk was determined for workers exposed to noise at workplaces in the years 2014–2016.
Results: We established that the limit of the equivalent sound level of 80 dBA was exceeded by 13–16 dBA at the workplaces of mechanics, electricians, and motor mechanics of the shipping company. In accordance with R 2.2.1766–03, Guidelines on occupational risk assessment for workers’ health: Organizational and methodological aspects, principles and criteria, the health risk posed by noise exposure was moderate (significant), category 2, for mechanics and senior stokers (turners) and high (intolerable), category 2, for first-class stokers. In accordance with the Russian National Standard GOST R ISO 1999-2017, Acoustics. Estimation of noise-induced hearing loss, methodology, the probability of mild hearing loss by 26 dB (first degree of sensorineural hearing loss) in seafarers of the studied occupations at the age of 40, 50 and 60 years with a 10-year work experience years was 13.1 %, 29.7 %, and 50.4 %, respectively; the probability of moderate hearing loss by 41 dB (second degree of sensorineural hearing loss) was 0 % for the age of 40 and 50 years and 17.0 % for the age of 60 years; the probability of mild hearing loss by 26 dB at the age of 50 with a work experience of 20 and 30 years was 36.7 % and 52.2 %, at the age of 60 – 58.2 % and 72.2 %; the probability of moderate hearing loss by 41 dB for these age groups was 0 % and 23.2 % for the seafarers with 20 years of experience, 27.4 % and 44.7 % for the seafarers with 30 years of experience, respectively.
Conclusion: Effective planning of measures for noise-induced occupational disease prevention requires a legislative decision on compulsory assessment of occupational risks of noise-induced hearing loss based on the results of audiometry of workers exposed to sound levels above 80 dBA within annual health checkups.

1. Shur PZ, Zaitseva NV, Fokin VA, Red’ko SV. Methodical approaches to assessing occupational health risks caused by exposure to 80-85 dB(A) noise. Gigiena i Sanitariya. 2020;99(8):866-870. (In Russ.) doi: 10.47470/0016-9900-2020-99-8-866-870

2. Alekseev VB, Zaitseva NV, Shur PZ. The prospects of occupational risk management during reforms of regulatory legislation basis. Meditsina Truda i Promyshlennaya Ekologiya. 2018;(10):39-44. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31089/1026-9428-2018-10-39-44

3. Denisov EI, Prokopenko LV, Golovaneva GV, Stepanyan IV. Paradigm shift in health: forecasting and causation as a basis for risk management. Gigiena i Sanitariya. 2012;91(5):62-65. (In Russ.)

4. Popova AYu, Gurvich VB, Kuzmin SV, Mishina AL, Yarushin SV. Modern issues of the health risk assessment and management. Gigiena i Sanitariya. 2017;96(12):1125-1129. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18821/0016-9900-2017-96-12-1125-1129

5. Mylnikova LA. Development of measures to manage risks to the health of working citizens. Meditsina Truda i Promyshlennaya Ekologiya. 2020;60(4):275-278. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31089/1026-9428-2020-60-4-275-278

6. Meltser AV, Erastova NV, Kiselev AV, Кropot АI. А priori occupational health risk of oil refining workers from noise production impact. Profilakticheskaya i Klinicheskaya Meditsina. 2021;(1(78)):12–19. (In Russ.) doi: 10.47843/2074-9120_2021_1_12

7. Mazitova NN, Adeninskaya EE, Pankova VB, et al. Influence of occupational noise on hearing: systematic review of foreign literature. Meditsina Truda i Promyshlennaya Ekologiya. 2017;(2):48-53. (In Russ.)

8. Volgareva AD, Karimova LK, Mavrina LN, Gimaeva ZF, Beigul NA. In-plant noise as occupational risk factor at petrochemical plants. Health Risk Analysis. 2017;(1):116-124. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21668/health.risk/2017.1.13

9. Bukhtiyarov IV. Сurrent state and main directions of preservation and strengthening of health of the working population of Russia. Meditsina Truda i Promyshlennaya Ekologiya. 2019;59(9):527-532. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31089/1026-9428-2019-59-9-527-532

10. Bukhtiyarov IV, Denisov EI, Courierov NN, Prokopenko LV, Bulgakova MV, Khahileva OO. Improvement of noise-induced hearing loss criteria and occupational risk assessment. Meditsina Truda i Promyshlennaya Ekologiya. 2018;(4):1-9. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31089/1026-9428-2018-4-1-9

11. Popova AYu. Working conditions and occupational morbidity in the Russian Federation. Meditsina Truda i Ekologiya Cheloveka. 2015;(3):7–13. (In Russ.)

12. Vil’k MF, Pankova VB, Kaptsov VA. Traffic noise as a risk factor for occupational deafness (exemplified by air and railway transport). Meditsina Truda i Promyshlennaya Ekologiya. 2017;(9):36-37. (In Russ.)

13. Trankovsky DE. Working conditions and occupational morbidity transport workers in Primorsky Region. Zdorov’e. Meditsinskaya Ekologiya. Nauka. 2014;(4(58)):111-113. (In Russ.)

14. Kazakevich EV, Arkhipovsky VL, Doronin IA. Medical inspections of Northern Fleet personnel: results, analysis, problems. Meditsina Ekstremal’nykh Situatsiy. 2018;20(2):172-179. (In Russ.)

15. Kim KS. Occupational hearing loss in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2010;25(Suppl):S62-S69. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2010.25.S.S62

16. Fuente A, Hickson L. Noise-induced hearing loss in Asia. Int J Audiol. 2011;50(Suppl 1):S3-S10. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.540584

17. Nelson DI, Nelson RY, Concha-Barrientos M, Fingerhut M. The global burden of occupational noise-induced hearing loss. Am J Ind Med. 2005;48(6):446-458. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20223

18. Sliwinska-Kowalska M, Davis A. Noise-induced hearing loss. Noise Health. 2012;14(61):274-280. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.104893

19. Toppila E, Pyykkö I, Pääkkönen R. Evaluation of the increased accident risk from workplace noise. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2009;15(2):155-162. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2009.11076796

20. Régime général tableau 42. Atteinte auditive provoquée par les bruits lésionnels. (In French.) Accessed January 24, 2022. https://www.inrs.fr/mp09/2017

21. Blaginina TF, Bolotnova TV. Sensorineural hearing loss as a predictor of endothelial dysfunction in some non-communicable diseases in the working population (a review of interdisciplinary studies). Kubanskiy Nauchnyy Meditsinskiy Vestnik. 2020;27(2):113-126. (In Russ.) doi: 10.25207/1608-6228-2020-27-2-113-126

22. Fokin VA, Shlyapnikov DM, Red’ko SV. Risk assessment of occupational and occupationally conditioned diseases connection to noise when exceeding maximum permissible levels. Meditsina Truda i Promyshlennaya Ekologiya. 2018;(10):17-19. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31089/1026-9428-2018-10-17-19

23. Syurin SA, Boiko IV. Noise-induced hearing loss in industrial workers of the Murmansk Region. Zdorov’e Naseleniya i Sreda Obitaniya. 2020;(2(323)):21-25. (In Russ.) doi: 10.35627/2219-5238/2020-323-2-21-25

24. Merkulova NA. Hygienic assessment of the occupational risk of noise effects on the organ of hearing in furniture makers. Zdorov’e Naseleniya i Sreda Obitaniya. 2020;(5(326)):42-46. (In Russ.) doi: 10.35627/2219-5238/2020-326-5-42-46

25. Yolkina VN, Kiyok OV. The special estimation of working conditions on the geophisical exploring research vessel. Zdorov’e Naseleniya i Sreda Obitaniya. 2017;(4(289)):19-21. (In Russ.) doi: 10.35627/2219-5238/2017-289-4-19-21